Quelonio
El rey de la Pachacha
Ginobili was awesome!!!!! If I owned a team, I would want Manu in it.
Suns vs. Spurs
- Thread starter bullseyeguy
- Start date
Den54
Punk Exterminator
I meant I'm happy that they lost if it meant saving the Fins from a 10 year losing season.
Wagon Circler
☠️ Banned ☠️
Lol it's easy to say the suns didn't win because they aren't a championship team when the league spots you a game haha. You'd be singing a different tune if Bowen and Duncan were suspended from that game too. Spurs don't deserve to win anything.
And way to throw a football zing in there. Did you forget you are a dolphin fan? LOL. Try not talking smack when your team has been bottom feeders the last few years. Oh, not to mention draft day clowns.
My tone hasn't changed a single bit since the BS call. Whatever hope there was after that was slim at best. The Spurs are hard enough to beat without such help, damn near impossible with it.
(not a smilie I guess 
) clueless.We'll never really know :wink:
You're supposed to oblige god damnit :wink:
Why? You were wrong on both accounts. "could have" is convenient way for spurs fans to shrug off what happened, but it works both ways. The league "could have" followed its own precedent in the ruling and consider intent as I described before. The spurs "could have" avoided the dirty play throughout the series, but particularly in the play that caused the incident, etc. But don't worry, I don't expect you, as a fan of the team rewarded, to agree. I expect the gloss over. However, the "could have" argument is weak as hell because it ignores the obvious advantages awarded to your team including playing a gimped Suns in game 5 and an exhausted Suns in game 6 in san antonio as a further result.
And you are wrong again on the second point. 5-11 sounds better.
Why? You were wrong on both accounts. "could have" is convenient way for spurs fans to shrug off what happened, but it works both ways. The league "could have" followed its own precedent in the ruling and consider intent as I described before. The spurs "could have" avoided the dirty play throughout the series, but particularly in the play that caused the incident, etc. But don't worry, I don't expect you, as a fan of the team rewarded, to agree. I expect the gloss over. However, the "could have" argument is weak as hell because it ignores the obvious advantages awarded to your team including playing a gimped Suns in game 5 and an exhausted Suns in game 6 in san antonio as a further result.
And you are wrong again on the second point. 5-11 sounds better.
Something is wrong with the script b/c you still arent obliging
Nah, it's typeset "Logical," the bold version of "Reality." Limited release.Something is wrong with the script b/c you still arent obliging
But, that isn't compatible with my True Champs OS. You can only get that if you have the OS Chumps With No Chance Ver. 1.0. Unfortunately, that series was just hacked like it was made by a child and now we are awaiting Ver. 2.0•• which is still in development.
Regarding the pick. It doesn't really matter. The league will find plenty of ways of helping out their golden boys. I guess asterisked dynasties sell better than no dynasties in the leagues eyes. :wink:
Holy crap, this thread really won't die.
on a side note:
"But, that isn't compatible with my True Champs OS. You can only get that if you have the OS Chumps With No Chance Ver. 1.0. Unfortunately, that series was just hacked like it was made by a child and now we are awaiting Ver. 2.0•• which is still in development."
...that's pretty funny.
