And why is that? Because of a good camp? If your play in camp is super important, legedu Naanee would still be our starter. Let's let the kid get a few actual games in before we start naming the kid who hasn't even played an actual game yet a star. (I know you didn't say that, but I've seen it said)
Right now, out of the receivers, Tannehill has shown the most chemistry in actual games with Hartline and Gibson, why take that away from him? I say if Landry is really good enough to unseat Gibson, show it in pre-season games. If Landry and Gibson are pretty even, I see no reason to rush Landry into the game over Gibson, Landry has all the time in the world to build chemistry with Tannehill. Right now Tannehill has in game chemistry with Gibson, and barring an amazing pre-season from Landry, I say let Landry develop under the vets.