Tannehill vs Luck Updated | Page 22 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Tannehill vs Luck Updated

OMG are we really debating this? Look, Chad Henne's stats in his first 1.5 seaons look similar to RT's but are we going to sit here and say he was as good? Hell no! We saw him play and all know the difference in the Atlanta game this year is with RT we go 80 yards for the winning TD. With Henne we go 17 hards and throw a pick. You can't measure "winner-ship" by these stats.

Luck plays like a polished as a 5 year vet - look at all his come from behind wins, clutch play with his feet, etc. Look how much his TD to INT ratio has cut down from rookie year to this year. RT isn't at Luck's level yet - not even close. I love RT - I am a huge supporter and I love how he is developing. But c'mon - Luck is the far better player right now. And I don't want to hear about Luck's "weapons". Donald Brown = Daniel Thomas. TY Hilton < Mike Wallace. Colby Fleener < Brian Hartline. Trent Richardson has been a bust so far. This is the same type of personel on Indy that went 2-14 with Dan Orlovsky at QB. The Colts do not have better offensive weapons than the Phins - except at QB.

Also, Luck doesn't miss a wide open Mike Wallace down the sideline game in/out. Not taking a cheap shot but in my mind RT has to improve in two key areas: pocket awareness / when to use his feet AND his deep ball. His deep ball is flat out terrible. Last year when he was over throwing Hartline (except the one big one in the AZ game) I blamed it on how slow our WRs were. This year, underthrowing Wallace, leading him out of bounds, etc - Matt Moore hits those. Nick Foles hits those. Geno Smith for crying out loud has been hitting those (and he sucks). Andrew Luck most certainly hits those - anyone watch him in the 4th quarter light up the Texans w TY Hilton after doing nothing for the first 3 quarters of the game? Luck my be over-hyped right now but make no mistake - he's the better player right now and it isn't even close. At all. That said, RT's ceiling is very high and he continues to show growth. I love the guy but I have to call it like I see it - use your feet Ryan and learn how to hit the deep throw. And finally, who cares about Andrew Luck? Don't measure yourself to him - or anyone for that matter. Just keep growing and lead us to a world championship!
 
CKs article on bleacher report breaks down RTs deep throws very well. Throw to Wallace against SD was doomed to fail by design.

I think it would be fair to assess RT on this last 6 games. As Junc often points out, it is important to see how our young QB responds in these MEANINGFUL games. If he rises to the challenge and becomes the reason why we win games (I believe he will) then we have our answer at QB. If he orchestrates a few game winning/tying drives in the clutch then we have a basis for comparison with Luck. After the first 3 weeks of this season it was looking like RT could be mentioned with the likes of Luck. Now, that seems like a year ago. Let's go fins!
 
The major thing that luck does that separates himself is his ability to make big plays, tannehill IMO has been pretty damn good this year at running tje offense, hitting open guys, threading the needle.

But he just doesnt make big plays happen, and to neat top tear teams, to get a better than average record, you need a qb that makes big plays happen.
 
Luck plays like a polished as a 5 year vet

Luck my be over-hyped right now

First statement is false. Second statement is true. I like Luck and have consistently said he is the best young QB but come on, a polished 5 year vet? If he is playing like this in 5 years, many people will be very disappointed. The hyperbole is not really necessary.
 
luck is quite polished but his accuracy isn't the best that's for sure...he can miss some throws in the middle of the field and on intermediate routes...pretty money though at the end of games
 
First statement is false. Second statement is true. I like Luck and have consistently said he is the best young QB but come on, a polished 5 year vet? If he is playing like this in 5 years, many people will be very disappointed. The hyperbole is not really necessary.
I think you took part of my comments out of context. There are a lot of veteran QBs who do not have the instincts of Luck, nor are as good. But that's not the point - we are debating if RT is on par with AL right now and IMO it's not close...yet.
 
I think you took part of my comments out of context. There are a lot of veteran QBs who do not have the instincts of Luck, nor are as good. But that's not the point - we are debating if RT is on par with AL right now and IMO it's not close...yet.

Why would you say it is not close? We saw them go head to head. Do you think Luck outclassed Tannehill in that game? I sure don't.
 
Back
Top Bottom