Tannehill's Struggles Over The Middle- A Closer Look | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Tannehill's Struggles Over The Middle- A Closer Look

So Be

So Be

Active Roster
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
16,572
Reaction score
2,216
I've read some articles here on RT's problems in throwing to the middle of the field, and took a closer look. I found the problems to be in the middle between 10 and 19 yards.

RT was 45 of 71 for 840 yards, 3 TD's but 6 of his 17 picks. Here's a WR breakdown.

Hartline- caught 16 of 20, 1 pick and 1 drop. No problem there.

Matthews- 6 of 9, 0 picks, 0 drops. No problem there.

Wallace- 9 of 16, 2 picks, 3 drops. Problem.

Gibson- 4 of 7, 1 pick, 1 drop. Not VG.

Clay- 7 of 15, 2 picks, 2 drops. Problem.

Totals of 6 picks and 7 drops on 71 throws is not getting it done but, the pr0blems were with new receivers, and should improve a lot this year.

* Side note- In 2012, RT went to Clay 6 times for 2 catches and 3 drops. Clay really needs to improve in this area.
 
You couldn't have added this to the 27 other Tannehill threads?
 
It's a load of crap. Tannehill is very accurate over the middle. The problem with the middle is that there is a lot more traffic there. His completion percentages over the middle are on par with the left and right, and is even better than the right. The right though, tends to be where we through all our long passes...so, that has to be taken into account.
 
flynryan15 said:
You couldn't have added this to the 27 other Tannehill threads?
Click to expand...

My sincerest apologies to you and any other poster who is bored with this thread. I thought the title was very specific, and only read and posted to by those who had interest in it, and not by those with nothing better to do than say it should not be here.

Remind me to PM you on future threads for your approval before submitting them. LOL
 
Dr. Phin said:
It's a load of crap. Tannehill is very accurate over the middle. The problem with the middle is that there is a lot more traffic there. His completion percentages over the middle are on par with the left and right, and is even better than the right. The right though, tends to be where we through all our long passes...so, that has to be taken into account.
Click to expand...

I have to wonder how many of those 6 picks were on the receivers going over the middle. The 7 drops does say something.
 
Dr. Phin said:
It's a load of crap. Tannehill is very accurate over the middle. The problem with the middle is that there is a lot more traffic there. His completion percentages over the middle are on par with the left and right, and is even better than the right. The right though, tends to be where we through all our long passes...so, that has to be taken into account.
Click to expand...
That was because of Sherman's brilliant idea of lining Wallace up in the same spot every play
 
Southbeach 2 said:
My sincerest apologies to you and any other poster who is bored with this thread. I thought the title was very specific, and only read and posted to by those who had interest in it, and not by those with nothing better to do than say it should not be here.

Remind me to PM you on future threads for your approval before submitting them. LOL
Click to expand...

No you did not make this thread for any other reason then you are a attention whore. Just like your dozens of other threads that pollute the board. Now because you got called out you want to be a drama queen! You don't have to PM me before you start a thread, just think before you type.
 
Ummmm...I am here to defend FlynRyan.

Southbeach, he is right.

Thanks!
 
Dr. Phin said:
It's a load of crap. Tannehill is very accurate over the middle. The problem with the middle is that there is a lot more traffic there. His completion percentages over the middle are on par with the left and right, and is even better than the right. The right though, tends to be where we through all our long passes...so, that has to be taken into account.
Click to expand...

If you include the 7 drops, RT was accurate on 52 of 71 throws (73%). How good is that?
 
flynryan15 said:
No you did not make this thread for any other reason then you are a attention whore. Just like your dozens of other threads that pollute the board. Now because you got called out you want to be a drama queen! You don't have to PM me before you start a thread, just think before you type.
Click to expand...

Man, I thought I was the forum a-hole but you take the cake
 
finjim said:
I have been banned over 20 times, that is MY title.

So.....there.
Click to expand...

Oh you can be a royal a-hole without getting banned. Getting banned is just being a sloppy temperamental a-hole. Being an in-control a-hole avoiding bans takes real skill.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom