This is a forum of people who interpret the same information in a multitude of different ways. The forum places no greater responsibility on the "thread-starter" than it does on anyone else for "accurate" interpretations of information. People reading the thread are free to give as much credibility to the thread-starter's interpretations as they are to anyone else's, and how much credibility I have in one post or in general in the eyes of the other members of the forum is not my concern. You're free to give me as much or as little credibility as you'd like, just as you're free to believe my personal interpretations of information are as accurate or as inaccurate as you'd like.You still twisted the original quote to mean all kinds of things that weren't said. This whole thread is based on a fraud, and there are people who walked away misinformed. I believe the quotes in the article came out Monday and that you were corrected then. You mis-stated the situation and it's not ok. For someone who is obsessed with metrics, you of all people should be concerned about accuracy.
You took a benign quote and applied false meaning to it. When you bring one of your fanciful stats up for discussion we can all wonder what false premise underlies it now, especially when you stubbornly won't admit your inaccuracy or mistake.
In other words, neither I nor anyone else has any responsibility for anyone else here. You have complete responsibility for yourself and your own thoughts and beliefs, including how credible you believe me to be.