- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 11,067
- Reaction score
- 15,080
Remember what he did on the next play?
The OFFICIAL "Start Matt Moore next game" Thread
- Thread starter Fins4Ever&Ever
- Start date
enigmatics
Go get me a juice box!
Remind us again what Tanny did in that game considering he was the season long starter and actually prepped for the game as the starter.
Matt Moore the stealth QB.... even his own coaches don't notice him.
enigmatics
Go get me a juice box!
More trolling commentary from you.
Sort of like a "start the 3 time looser backup QB" thread....
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 11,067
- Reaction score
- 15,080
Why do you always want to change the subject from Moore to Tannehill? Oh yeah...
enigmatics
Go get me a juice box!
Man its funny how hostile you get over all of this.
Ilovemyfins4eva
Active Roster
no one would complain about that, but at the same time, its better that when u make a mistake to try and fix that mistake before its too late, rather than letting that mistake stay unfixed.
i dont care for philbin, i dont see anything really in him that would make me miss him if he were fired, but if he did switch to moore over tannehill and the fins were more succesfull, maybe he would get one more chance, whether we like it or not.
also, i feel tannehill, while deff connected to philbin because he was the head coach, i am not positive we take him if sherman is not hired.
---------- Post added at 07:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:03 PM ----------
the moore supporters have brought up reasons y they would like moore over tannehill.
now please tell us ur reasoning, based on there play, as to why tannehill is the better fit?
Considering the OL ranked 28-32 by 4 out of 5 analytic services, no blocking TE, the 26th ranked running game, a rookie kicker with the yips, a red zone receiving threat going down in TC and the 2012 most dependable 3rd and TD completion percentage receiver going down midseason, a dinosaur calling his plays and the kind of unnecessary distraction brought about by a wus who couldn't handle the the kind of non physical hazing that most 18 year old frat pledges would have welcomed by comparison, it's amazing that Tannehill over-achieved beating 4 playoff bound teams and keeping us in contention until the kind of Buffalo mugging and injury that Tom Brady himself, the week before against us, demonstrated that even he couldn't overcome. So that would be 5 winning teams that Tannehill beat since the beginning of last season now.. 4 of 'em with no Wallace chemistry, a 7th round receiver pick, a 5th round hybrid TE and a natural #3 Wideout who he made into a two season 1000yd producer. It's a shame that based on the above, we were in not going into Buffalo already having clinched a playoff berth!
And just for grins for those who love to nitpick away at certain QBs and purposely ignore the short-comings of ones blessed with elite support tools who've had 10 second qtrs to confirm there's a void between his ears and his legs on the biggest stage when the hour of midnight is almost upon him.
Bottom Line: if we're gonna replace a QB who screws up against weak teams but beats strong teams and QBs, we better get one with cajones, cuz after the build up expectation of NoodleArm vs the Ravens, even knowing the history of his losing 2 or more out of every 3 games vs Top 10 scoring D's, 3 out of 3 in 08) while I agree to a point that it's nice making the playoffs, I really don't want to end up with another version of a deceptive Blue Balls QB!
And just for grins for those who love to nitpick away at certain QBs and purposely ignore the short-comings of ones blessed with elite support tools who've had 10 second qtrs to confirm there's a void between his ears and his legs on the biggest stage when the hour of midnight is almost upon him.
Bottom Line: if we're gonna replace a QB who screws up against weak teams but beats strong teams and QBs, we better get one with cajones, cuz after the build up expectation of NoodleArm vs the Ravens, even knowing the history of his losing 2 or more out of every 3 games vs Top 10 scoring D's, 3 out of 3 in 08) while I agree to a point that it's nice making the playoffs, I really don't want to end up with another version of a deceptive Blue Balls QB!
DolfanAdam
Scout Team
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2008
- Messages
- 837
- Reaction score
- 477
Obviously, this is a very polarizing topic depending on which side of the fence you stand on. The thing I simply cannot understand though, is how under Tannehill we have won nothing, but for the brief time we had Moore he has a winning record. I just don't even see what there is to debate.
How much more losing do we have to do under Tannehill before the rest of the board comes around to the idea of giving Moore a shot at starting just to see what happens? Why is that other teams seem to have no problem cycling through QBs until they hit on something, but Miami seems to have this one group of fans that will be content with whoever the team names the starter no matter how many years of losing they produce?
I think I can speak for anyone here who wants Moore as the starter when we say that he isn't destined to be the next Marino, but if the guy in there isn't working, wouldn't you want to try something else before the season is ruined?
How much more losing do we have to do under Tannehill before the rest of the board comes around to the idea of giving Moore a shot at starting just to see what happens? Why is that other teams seem to have no problem cycling through QBs until they hit on something, but Miami seems to have this one group of fans that will be content with whoever the team names the starter no matter how many years of losing they produce?
I think I can speak for anyone here who wants Moore as the starter when we say that he isn't destined to be the next Marino, but if the guy in there isn't working, wouldn't you want to try something else before the season is ruined?
DolfanISS
Perennial All-Pro
Considering the OL ranked 28-32 by 4 out of 5 analytic services, no blocking TE, the 26th ranked running game, a rookie kicker with the yips, a red zone receiving threat going down in TC and the 2012 most dependable 3rd and TD completion percentage receiver going down midseason, a dinosaur calling his plays and the kind of unnecessary distraction brought about by a wus who couldn't handle the the kind of non physical hazing that most 18 year old frat pledges would have welcomed by comparison, it's amazing that Tannehill over-achieved beating 4 playoff bound teams and keeping us in contention until the kind of Buffalo mugging and injury that Tom Brady himself, the week before against us, demonstrated that even he couldn't overcome. So that would be 5 winning teams that Tannehill beat since the beginning of last season now.. 4 of 'em with no Wallace chemistry, a 7th round receiver pick, a 5th round hybrid TE and a natural #3 Wideout who he made into a two season 1000yd producer. It's a shame that based on the above, we were in not going into Buffalo already having clinched a playoff berth!
And just for grins for those who love to nitpick away at certain QBs and purposely ignore the short-comings of ones blessed with elite support tools who've had 10 second qtrs to confirm there's a void between his ears and his legs on the biggest stage when the hour of midnight is almost upon him.
Bottom Line: if we're gonna replace a QB who screws up against weak teams but beats strong teams and QBs, we better get one with cajones, cuz after the build up expectation of NoodleArm vs the Ravens, even knowing the history of his losing 2 or more out of every 3 games vs Top 10 scoring D's, 3 out of 3 in 08) while I agree to a point that it's nice making the playoffs, I really don't want to end up with another version of a deceptive Blue Balls QB!
I thought you were a Moore guy. What happened to all that "sea legs" talk"? :).
enigmatics
Go get me a juice box!
When did this discussion become about Matt Ryan?
enigmatics
Go get me a juice box!
My thoughts exactly. This isn't a situation where our back up QB is Pat Devlin. The division is weakened and yet the season is already under the gun in terms of playoff possibilities and you have a guy who's proven he can win games. Why not make the switch during the BYE if we look flat again vs. the Raiders knowing that if you don't get things moving everyone is a goner anyways?
You got a good memory. And yes, that was mostly to refute our resident [strike]****roa[/strike] troll in his attacks on him and unfavorable comparison to a QB who loves butts so much he can't keep away from them even on the field. I admire and respect Moore; was there in person watching his encouragement and leadership galvanizing a dispirited team on the sidelines and think even though RT17 beat him out, he still should have started for that first year. So nowhere in defending Tannehill, the same way I defended Moore, will you ever see me dogging him. However I find it disturbing that when he resigned, he either was in no demand to compete for a starter's job or decided that even in his 20s, he'd rather take the money and run instead of having the confidence to win a job in head to head competition. But be that as it may, he's been a good mentor for Tannehill and great teammate.
I just think that Tannehill showed us more than enough up thru game 14 of last season to let him sink or swim in this new system because of my perception of his upside. If pulled, I believe he'll be done here and he's shown too much up until the mugging in Buffalo and injury to give up on him at this point when we're not a legitimate threat either way to go more than 1 game if that into the playoffs no matter who's QBing. I don't want to be an Atlanta fan or a 2008 Fins fan. Tannehill has shown he can beat good teams and QBs.
enigmatics
Go get me a juice box!
Good to hear that's what it was actually like at the games because that's what I thought I saw happening on television. It has been so long since I've seen that kind of thing from our QB position.