The OFFICIAL "Start Matt Moore next game" Thread | Page 27 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

The OFFICIAL "Start Matt Moore next game" Thread

Missed the first half, was outside stacking wood for the winter. Checked the score once, when it was 3 - 7 Raiders went back outside slightly upset. but i refused to let football get to me anymore.

Finished outside, saw the score at halftime. Came on here read some of the early threads and laughed a lot.
 
Should have started Moore. Fins would be up 44-7

lol, ur right, if tannehill played like this against every ****ing weak team we played, the dolphins would be a good team.

unfortunately, this is the first time in his career as fins qb, that tannehill has done what he is supposed to do vs a vastly inferior team.

i and i am sure many others on here who were on the same side as i, feel the same way still.

its great he is having an awesome game vs oakland, heck he does not even need to play this well every week for us to win, but he better ****ing bring it every ****ing week, not just vs this **** team,

also, it would be nice if tannehill can play like this in the u.s.a ( sarcasm on this part)
 
dreamscometruedreamscancometrue310828594-1.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lol, ur right, if tannehill played like this against every ****ing weak team we played, the dolphins would be a good team.

unfortunately, this is the first time in his career as fins qb, that tannehill has done what he is supposed to do vs a vastly inferior team.

i and i am sure many others on here who were on the same side as i, feel the same way still.

its great he is having an awesome game vs oakland, heck he does not even need to play this well every week for us to win, but he better ****ing bring it every ****ing week, not just vs this **** team,

also, it would be nice if tannehill can play like this in the u.s.a ( sarcasm on this part)


You sound like me when I declare "the next time Melty Ice doesn't crap the bed in the 2nd half of a playoff game will be the first - and still must be considered an anomaly" Go figure we're on the same page on this. :idk:
 
Same clowns hating....now it's an inferior team. How about the receivers holding on to the ball and time to throw without someone constantly in your face. Their responses don't surprise me though, typical nonsense. They should be happy, Matt Moore got to play!
 
Same clowns hating....now it's an inferior team. How about the receivers holding on to the ball and time to throw without someone constantly in your face. Their responses don't surprise me though, typical nonsense. They should be happy, Matt Moore got to play!

Actually the receivers had plenty of drops. The defense gave up some first downs and some points. The team even looked.....FLAT according to all the usual suspects.

But nobody else seems to remember that stuff today, I wonder what the reason for that could possibly be.......
 
Just to be clear I could give 2 ****s about being right about what I post here because at the end of the day it's irrelevant anyway. No complaints from me, we did just what we should have done vs a bad Oakland football team. Now let's get healthy over the bye, play with some damn consistency and keep it rolling in a couple of weeks.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Actually the receivers had plenty of drops. The defense gave up some first downs and some points. The team even looked.....FLAT according to all the usual suspects.

But nobody else seems to remember that stuff today, I wonder what the reason for that could possibly be.......
is it because the qb played well enough? lol i know ur being sarcastic.

what these fools do not understand though, an nfl team will go as far as there qb will take them.

isnt it amazing how these ppl who always r blaming the o line for our losses and not the qb, now we do not here anything about the o line because the qb played well?

i can bet u though vs gb, if we get a typical tannehill start, it will be due to the o line playing poorly.

so we learned when tannehill has absolutely no pressure around him he can do well, but so can any qb.

the problem is when there is pressure throughout a game, he ****s the bed. i am not getting suckered in because of one awesome game.

i deff give him credit for once in his career doing what he is supposed to do, stomp on a terrible team.

vs green bay and in chicago the week after that will be very telling
 
You sound like me when I declare "the next time Melty Ice doesn't crap the bed in the 2nd half of a playoff game will be the first - and still must be considered an anomaly" Go figure we're on the same page on this. :idk:

Phins WIN big today and now MATTY ICE is on and I get to watch the whole game since they play at a different time.

You should watch Vaark. You might learn something. Channel 713 if you are not a poor and have Directv.
 
Yes he did his job. I predicted before the season that Tannehill would put up some sick stats on the season because defenses would continue to play him like a rookie and I knew these types of performances should be possible. I'm not expecting him to play like this every week but if we get 8 or 9 of these a season we shouldn't lose more than 6 games.
 
Phins WIN big today and now MATTY ICE is on and I get to watch the whole game since they play at a different time.

You should watch Vaark. You might learn something. Channel 713 if you are not a poor and have Directv.

No one here is interested in that. Take note of how Tannehill played today. Praise him even and people might think you're a Dolphins fan and not a Falcons fan.
 
Phins WIN big today and now MATTY ICE is on and I get to watch the whole game since they play at a different time.

You should watch Vaark. You might learn something. Channel 713 if you are not a poor and have Directv.

Tannehill kills it and Matty loses? Nightmare scenario. :boohoo:
 
Back
Top Bottom