The OFFICIAL "Start Matt Moore next game" Thread

[SoCal Finatic]

Moore is so good that they drafted a qb in round 1, and signed David Garrard and named Garrard the starter.

Hahahaha good point.

 

[Geordie]

Some of these post are absolutely PATHETIC do you look back and see how long it took Philly to get going last year. They started out 1-3 before the train got rolling. Relax and give it a few weeks, it will come around. We will get Pouncey back, along with Jones & Jordan & Misi....or go root for some one else!!

So what you are saying is agree with my opinion because I am right or stop following the team you love. Who's the one being pathetic ???

 

[Trucanes99]

The OFFICIAL you know nothing about football thread

 

[Dr. Phin]

So we're just on the bottom of the sine curve?

Derivative is approaching 0...

 

[Dr. Phin]

So was this loss all on Tannehill and Philbin?

No. That is a side issue. Regardless of the outcome of the game, this game was one in which to many it is becoming apparent that Tannehill "is what he is" and that's it. There is no upside, and what he is is not good enough.

 

[The Stache99]

Glad I checked out this thread. Needed a laugh

 

[DuderinoN703]

So...how does one start an "official" thread? Do we need to purchase some kind of licensing saying it is an "official thread"....

You cant really say its "official"....unless it really is. Otherwise ....its not.

It's self-appointed official which means nothing in reality.

 

[doughbraz54]

No. That is a side issue. Regardless of the outcome of the game, this game was one in which to many it is becoming apparent that Tannehill "is what he is" and that's it. There is no upside, and what he is is not good enough.

So the dropped passes, no run game, bad oline play, weak defense in the second half had nothing to do with it. Is Tannehill on shaky ground? Very much so. I'll reserve my judgement until the end of the season.

 

[Dr. Phin]

So the dropped passes, no run game, bad oline play, weak defense in the second half had nothing to do with it. Is Tannehill on shaky ground? Very much so. I'll reserve my judgement until the end of the season.

Yes. I look at them as separate issues. If I see a play were he has good protection and all he is doing is checking down to a back out of the backfield and can't even throw him a decent pass...I can judge that without looking at the dropped passes, run game or OL.

i just do not see any progression from last year. I think we have seen his upside...this is it...this is all there is.

 

[buxster07]

:
Because there has to be a good f'in reason they re-signed him to a 2 year 8 million dollar deal last year. Why give a back-up QB 4 million a year to stand on the sidelines??? Put that 4 million on the field, and watch the deep ball land in the hands of these talented receivers. Because they are wasting away with RT.

Moore was paid for a reason, and we are going to see him.

I'm giving Tannehill another game or two for a chance to bounce back. If he can't, let's roll with Moore.

 

[Highzenga]

Ok I think everyone is overreacting. Starting Moore does us no good. We will not win a playoff game with Matt Moore let's be serious. I'd rather fail miserably with T-hill than get knocked out in the 1st rnd w Moore. Remember, the goal is to win the Super Bowl.

 

[johngarryvo]

why bother with MM now with no Moreno and an even lamer than lame Miller?!! that's like sayin super glue his right hand to his bum and make him play lefty.. cheeky

 

[Geordie]

I'm not a Tanny believer at all, never have been ever since his college days and the fateful day we spent our top 10 pick on a 3rd round talent. I'm also not a hater of Moore, I like the dude, great back up QB. But I still think it's too early to make this call, we've got to stick with RT and give him the opportunity to show people like myself that we have it wrong. I think that's highly unlikely but starting MM will do nothing more than ensure an 8 and 8, at least with RT in there there's a chance we could get another top 10 pick next year.

 

[finomenal]

:3w:

Because there has to be a good f'in reason they re-signed him to a 2 year 8 million dollar deal last year. Why give a back-up QB 4 million a year to stand on the sidelines??? Put that 4 million on the field, and watch the deep ball land in the hands of these talented receivers. Because they are wasting away with RT.

Moore was paid for a reason, and we are going to see him. I want to see him starting Week #3. I would expect instant chemistry with Wallace, and getting Gibson and Hartline into the game more. Not to mention throwing an effective screen with the RB or TE. All things MM can do.

Let this be the official thread.

No not trolling. RT bag lickers need not respond.

Hell no. If we're gonna lose, let's at least do that right. No need padding the stats.

Jameis or bust. Or another QB who's franchise material. I don't watch college ball so I have no idea, but Tannehill isn't it.

 

[Semedi]

I can't wait to see Matt Moore cut so I don't have to see these awful topics pop up every other Sunday. He's not an answer to anything... if anything he unbelievably ****ed this franchise out of getting Andrew Luck.