The way I see it going in 2014 (long post) | Page 2 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

The way I see it going in 2014 (long post)

No team has anything locked up....to many variable that play into a season.

Miami could go 6-10 or 12-4...injuries alone can greatly change the scenario.

Tom Brady is 37....the body is not as durable as a twenty something with less wear and tear....he goes down and the Patriots are done.

This could also be the year he starts declining... you never know.

If Tannehill takes the next step...the O-line comes together...anything is possible.
 
I agree with a lot but massively disagree that Albert is and upgrade over what we used to have in Jake Long.

I for one loved Jake Long and appreciate the fact that he has incurred numerous lingering injuries due to the fact he played through injury in meaningless games, where Sparano refused to sit him out.
 
I agree with the premise of everything you said in the post. I think the reason it all might not add up to success is because we are missing something else. We are missing the attitude that other teams are taking away something that belongs to us. If you ask Brady on game day whether or not they will win and he will arrogantly say yes, but he will take offense that he is being asked. I think if every Dolphin played with that pissed off mentality like the Raven's defense under Ray Lewis played with, we would go undefeated. The talent is in place. Our rookie RT is playing well because he understands he is accountable to Tannehill and the organization to protect him. It is not okay to lose. We are not playing to upset someone else. We are the stronger team and we need to punch anyway in the mouth that thinks otherwise. Our defensive players need to defend the goal line like it is their mother. That kind of attitude is the difference between a winner and loser. What happens in nature when an alpha male whips an aggressive younger male looking to take his place? The whipped animal is forever submissive because it has been defeated. We are playing with the attitude of facing the alpha instead of already being the alpha. F*ck the Patriots.
 
I appreciate that I grew up in an era in which I could dream that the Dolphins were great, and they were
 
Joe Philbin was pretty aggressive and showed a willingness to go for it on 4th down early on as the Dolphins coach. He started playing it closer to the vest and I think that was a huge mistake for him.

We have a football team that is talented but prone to mistakes. Dropped footballs, missed blocking assignments, fumbles, interceptions, etc. We need to sustain drives. I don't want to see Brandon Fields punting the ball from midfield unless it's 4th and at least 5 or 6.

Well with how much of a disaster the OL and the jumping of snaps got at points last year I can't blame Philbin for playing it closer to the vest. BUt that's been something that has been discussed to no end.

1. Chip Kelly's Theory

Have read on here countless times since the hiring of Bill Lazor as offensive coordinator that he won't run any of the stuff Chip ran, because we don't have a Shady McCoy, or their offensive line. Any kind of comment like that tells me that the person saying that has zero clue about the beauty of the Chip Kelly offense. I have been a huge fan of Chip for a long time now, I highly, highly recommend the site Fishduck.com to anyone trying to learn about the offense. You can also check out Fishduck Minute videos on youtube where he really breaks down everything about the offense. Giving you a cliff's notes version of the offense would be to tell you that he doesn't want a 500 page playbook, he wants to be able to master a few key concepts, allowing his players to play fast and with little hesitation. A KISS philosophy, Keep It Simple Stupid if you will. Look for matchups. Create matchups. Ask and you shall receive.

He wants versatile player's who he can then align all over the formation. Through formations, personnel groupings, shifts and motions, he is trying to find, and then more importantly, EXPLOIT your weaknesses. This offense has chunk yards a plenty, and it is by design. You can almost be a puppet master pulling the strings, moving the defense however you please. One of the things I can't wait to see progress are "packaged plays' The bubble screen off of play action to Brandon Gibson vs Atlanta was a beautiful thing to watch. It starts as most Chip play's do, simply counting the numbers, is it a light or heavy box. With the three receivers to the top, Atlanta did not match numbers, so instead of Tannehill going zone read keying on the defensive end, he gives the call for the bubble screen. Matthews goes to the outside CB to block, D Williams runs up the sideline, and Gibson does the bubble action. Stealing really. And the best part is, in regular season, that will be Mike Wallace wide, and all you have to do is throw the bubble a few times, regardless of gain, and sooon enough the D hesitates even a second, and Wallace is by the defense in an instant. This is the kind of stuff that the Chip offense creates. Force the defense to be fundamentally sound, to play assignment football, and take few risks (greater consequences) All of this goes against what a defense wants to do, after the TD drive vs Atlanta, the Falcons announcers begrudgingly said that the defense was on their heels the entire time.

Contrast this with the Mike Sherman offense, where through blue 88 Go, Go Go, my wife could by week 5 of 2012, while at the sink washing dishes, tell if run or pass was coming. Combine that farce with the abysmal talent to protect the QB, or open lanes in the running game, and you have a situation where a defense can pretty much be as attacking as you can possibly be. And Ryan Tannehill still had great success despite these difficult, almost impossible circumstances. So from one end of the spectrum, getting attacked with almost reckless abandon, to having the defense now on their heels and unsure what is coming next, with plays that can make the defense wrong no matter what they do, someone please tell me how this offense isn't about to simply be MUCH BETTER.

See I don't think you'll see a Chip Kelly offense because Bill Lazor was only with him for a year. I'm sure you will see influences from Chip, but Bill Lazor also has coached under Mike Holmgren, Dan Reeves, Joe Gibbs, and Jim Zorn. Lazor also called plays as a young coach at the University of Buffalo and was doing solid work at UVA before going to Philly. I think the influence from all those prior parties will be (and have been) shown in our playbook.
 
Well with how much of a disaster the OL and the jumping of snaps got at points last year I can't blame Philbin for playing it closer to the vest. BUt that's been something that has been discussed to no end.



See I don't think you'll see a Chip Kelly offense because Bill Lazor was only with him for a year. I'm sure you will see influences from Chip, but Bill Lazor also has coached under Mike Holmgren, Dan Reeves, Joe Gibbs, and Jim Zorn. Lazor also called plays as a young coach at the University of Buffalo and was doing solid work at UVA before going to Philly. I think the influence from all those prior parties will be (and have been) shown in our playbook.

Ya he's probably got somewhere in the neighborhood of 800+ plays in his total book...pared down to a manageable season package, further pared down by game. He's not Chip Kelly Jr.
 
Ya he's probably got somewhere in the neighborhood of 800+ plays in his total book...pared down to a manageable season package, further pared down by game. He's not Chip Kelly Jr.

Which is not a bad thing. Our first TD of the preseason was both a simple play but it was a brilliant play at the same time. It's one we ran several times when we had Fasano at TE, but instead of running it with a TE, we ran it with a slot WR.

As I've said, when Sherman tried different things on offense they had a tendency of working, but he didn't want to try new things. I'm not saying he needed to run a bunch of gadget plays, but simple little wrinkles make a world of difference.

Look at the difference in how Lazor and Sherman approached bad plays. Lazor has said "if a play doesn't work we have to figure out what we can do differently to make it work, or just scrap it." Sherman? "There was nothing wrong with the play, it was the execution." Which might not necessarily be wrong, but if the execution is never good on the same play, it may be time to look elsewhere
 
However, I listened to Bruce Murray on Sirius NFL radio go through his season projections for all teams and he sees Miami as a 4 - 12 season or worse. He and Rich Gannon interviewed Joe Philbin and he said that he was being generous forseeing 4 wins, because he sees the team as being so deficient in everything. He sees Miami, Buffalo and Oakland as clearly the worst teams in the NFL. (Gannon predicted an 8 - 8 season like last year).

He can have 4-12 or worse and I'll take a playoff win. Do you think he would accept that bet?
 
Dolphins played with the alpha mentality. Hopefully it was the turning point where we rose to take New England's place for the next decade.
 
Back
Top Bottom