ckparrothead
Premium Member
Mark Brunell.
Thats right, Brunell.
This quote comes from the Rocky Mountain News,
It indicates that Mark Brunell is to be had.
Before, all the sports writers answered the Fiedler haters by pointing out the obvious question...who is going to replace him? I mean, all the guys out there are very ambiguous when compared to Jay Fiedler. Kordella? NOT. Jake Plummer? Lost an aweful lot of games and struggled a whole lot. Brian Griese? Can't ask for a better surrounding cast than he has had over the last 3-4 years and he hasn't cut it...injuries and alcoholism. Charlie Batch? Come on now. A rookie? Even worst. Kurt Warner? Will he ever be the same, not to mention the price tag in picks (that we dont have) and $$$. Tim Couch or Kelly Holcombe? Couch also would carry a big price tag in picks and thats if they decide not to just keep the two of them. Holcombe could be a Jim Miller one hit wonder for all we know.
But if Mark Brunell is out there to be had....free of needing to give first round picks and whatnot for his services, then shouldn't we take a look at it? I mean this is the first quarterback that I can with all honesty say is DEFINITELY better than Fiedler, and is possibly within our grasp.
Now I've NEVER really been a Jay hater. But I'm starting to think that even though he wins, he doesn't make plays. He plays well when the team is playing well and he plays aweful when the team is playing aweful. He doesn't have the arm to hit our guys deep and this is largely why I believe James McKnight gets so much flack. Mark Brunell on the other hand, is a really good quarterback. I think it is the coaches' duty to investigate the possibility of signing Mark Brunell if he is let go.
Thats right, Brunell.
This quote comes from the Rocky Mountain News,
The Broncos also could make a run at Arizona Cardinals quarterback Jake Plummer, Jacksonville QB Mark Brunell or Elvis Grbac, who said this week he plans to come out of retirement and would like to be reunited with coach Mike Shanahan.
It indicates that Mark Brunell is to be had.
Before, all the sports writers answered the Fiedler haters by pointing out the obvious question...who is going to replace him? I mean, all the guys out there are very ambiguous when compared to Jay Fiedler. Kordella? NOT. Jake Plummer? Lost an aweful lot of games and struggled a whole lot. Brian Griese? Can't ask for a better surrounding cast than he has had over the last 3-4 years and he hasn't cut it...injuries and alcoholism. Charlie Batch? Come on now. A rookie? Even worst. Kurt Warner? Will he ever be the same, not to mention the price tag in picks (that we dont have) and $$$. Tim Couch or Kelly Holcombe? Couch also would carry a big price tag in picks and thats if they decide not to just keep the two of them. Holcombe could be a Jim Miller one hit wonder for all we know.
But if Mark Brunell is out there to be had....free of needing to give first round picks and whatnot for his services, then shouldn't we take a look at it? I mean this is the first quarterback that I can with all honesty say is DEFINITELY better than Fiedler, and is possibly within our grasp.
Now I've NEVER really been a Jay hater. But I'm starting to think that even though he wins, he doesn't make plays. He plays well when the team is playing well and he plays aweful when the team is playing aweful. He doesn't have the arm to hit our guys deep and this is largely why I believe James McKnight gets so much flack. Mark Brunell on the other hand, is a really good quarterback. I think it is the coaches' duty to investigate the possibility of signing Mark Brunell if he is let go.