Thanks for putting some context to the stat. That's why I hate stats that are posted "in a vacuum". Without context, they are merely promoting an agenda, whether it be pro or con.
In this particular case, though it isn't drastic, it would lead ppl to believe that Rodgers has been throwing more accurate passes than all 4 guys listed after him, but the reality is, his passes (on average) are almost pathetically short.
If Tua were passing for 3 air yds per, ppl would surely point it out to detract from his performance. I realize Rodgers has earned the benefit of doubt, but it still seems disingenuous to me.