Trade

[bigbry]

Re: Re: Re: Trade

Originally posted by Muck


My take: :up:

2003: 59.1%...3,546 yds...24 TDs...8 INTs...2 TDs rushing.

I'd sure like to have that on my team.

But he cant two years in a row. El Paso!


Bb

 

[Muck]

2002: 53.6%...3,572 yds...27 TDs...15 INTs...2 rushing TDs.

Pretty similar, eh??

This with his throwing arm about to fall off down the stretch. Kinda like Fiedler's in 2000.

Brooks got healthy, more mature in 2003....and his stats got even better (6% increase in completions, 7 less INTs).

 

[PhinsTD]

Oh, the fact that NO just signed him to a long extension and gave him a ton of money in bonus.

That may be a reaosn why NO would not let him go. Where did this idea even come from?

 

[Cranx]

Originally posted by PhinsmissedFG
Where did this idea even come from?

A misguided fan. :shakeno:

 

[P4E]

Originally posted by Cranx


A misguided fan. :shakeno:

Think about it: is there any other kind?