Exhibit A that you suck at comprehension and also chose to ignore my other posts. I will reiterate, as I already did before: If they relied on his opinion as the *final word*, then they should be fired. I even qualified that for you, and you *still chose to ignore it*.
You said - and I quote: "if the front office was asking him to provide a medical opinion, then *they* should have been fired", which can be reasonably interpreted as ANY medical advice, not just "final word". What you said was incorrect. That is where the argument lies. You said head trainers provide no medical advice, I disagreed. Now you want to reframe the argument into who has "final word", when it was originally about the role of a head trainer. Seems like you dont really have a point to make.
Want to know who has "final word"? The GM, not a doctor.