Dumbest post ever. The "Suck for Luck" sweepstakes does not work that way. You have to be genuinely bad, not intentionally.
You try telling a locker room full of athletic Alpha Males to play poorly intentionally.
- If you think a bunch of players playing for their livelihood are going to look bad for a season (and thus negatively affect their future salaries/contracts), you need to get a clue.
- If you think a bunch of players are going to intentionally play bad in the cutthroat business of the NFL so your franchise gets a great QB, you need to get a clue. If a player decides to play poorly so Luck will be on his team next year, he will probably not be around to play with Luck because he will get cut or traded because he played like crap.
- If you think a bunch of NFL veterans in their twilight years are going to give up "just one season" to get a great QB that can help them win a SB, you need to get a clue. Drafting Andrew Luck is not a guarantee of a SB victory; a veteran player will not give up one season to draft Luck, THEN give up one or two more seasons for Luck to develop into an elite QB. By that time a vet will be on another team or out of the league.
Seriously now...
Everyone knows that but so many people have expectations for this team that are ludicrous. Any level headed person would know that a 1-15 year or 4-12 year especially in this draft class is a better thing for this team in the long run. As a fan i don't care about how the players feel i care about whats best for my team