A few disagreements Ice.
The main one is Stallworth - he will go at #8 or higher. San Diego would be smart to lock up their triumvirate (Brees, Tomlinson & Stallworth) by taking Stallworth at #5 and Kansas City would bite your arm off to get him at #8 IMO.
Mike Williams has replaced Bryant McKinnie in some drafts as the No1 OT. A matter of opinion I guess though my personal preference is for McKinnie.
I think that the run on DT's is about right as you have it but that more WR's will be taken earlier than you have them listed at the moment.
Ed Reed is about 15 places too high - no way he goes before #25 - there's too much other quality around.
Pearson is a reach there IMO - Levi Jones maybe but both should still be available after #20.
I also think that you have too many CB's too early - Rumph is a second rounder at best. All the right attributes except he's too stiff in the turn and doesn't have naturally fluid movement. He'll do OK for someone but not in the first round.
Freeney will go in the 1st for someone who thinks he can help in their 4-3, that 40 time will be too much for some to ignore - I would be stunned and appalled if the Steelers took him though.
The Steelers have a boner for Lamont Thompson - if they can't trade down or up (Harris) that's who my money'd be on - even if Ed Reed is still there.
50. Houston - Bryan Thomas DE Alabama-Birmingham - Houston is using a 3-4 and they already have 2 good linemen, and in a 3-4 you need 3 dominant lineman, and Thomas would be the third.
Thomas doesn't have the size to play end in the 3-4. He's not solid enough against the run. Houston would pick him to be the LOLB ala Jason Gildon and try and get him to drop some weight. He is suspect in coverage though so he may be a better fit as a 4-3 RDE.
The rest is totally subjective - after all, who had Quicy Carter going to Dallas last year?
Good job Ice, keep it up!