Never said that we should take Moore over Wallace. I was simply responding to the train of thought that he would be available for us to bring back if needed. Also for the point of clarifying what I meant, I was really reffering more to Moore's current status in comparison to Armstrong. Speed? IMO they are about same IMO. That's all....
Nah I know what you were saying . . . what I mean is, Armstrong was returning kicks during that final preseason he was with us, and had he made the team, he would have been active because of it. Moore hasn't been doing returns, and with 4 guys clearly ahead of him, if he doesn't offer anything as a returner, he really has no value for this team outside of being a "replacement" guy. Livas, if kept, would be your primary returner and Wallace, if kept, is your gunner on special teams and your talented project WR with upside. I don't know if Moore fits that description.
Armstrong is quite a bit faster than Moore, I think Moore's speed is a bit overhyped due to the catch and run from the Raider's game and the fact that we were so "slow" on offense last year, he just stood out more. He is a better route runner than Clyde Gates, but I have just seen him drop too many passes and fight the ball on too many catches for me to keep him over Wallace. It wouldn't shock me if he got picked up by another team and got some burn . . . and it wouldn't surprise me if that catch in the Raiders game ends up being his legacy. Clyde Gates is the better "go" route guy . . . and that is the dimension we need added to this offense more than anything.
Plus when you have guys like Clay and Bush . . . your need for WR's get decreased . . . because 5 wide will usually 2 Rb's/TE.