Wallace sucks | Page 9 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Wallace sucks

Wallace is who he has always been a good WR with outstanding speed.....just because you pay him big money doesn't change who he is....stop expecting more from him its not his fault Ireland was biding against himself.....
 
jvw said:
Wallace is who he has always been a good WR with outstanding speed.....just because you pay him big money doesn't change who he is....stop expecting more from him its not his fault Ireland was biding against himself.....
Click to expand...

so people have high expectations for tannehill in year 2 but for wallace its just "eh, he is who he is ya cant change him".

You just cant make this **** up.
 
Sirspud said:
Brandon Marshall was disappointing. David Boston was disappointing. Marty Booker was disappointing. Mike Wallace is disappointing. At the end of the day, while its discouraging that we have always gotten worse play out of receivers than we should, I'd still rather get disappointing play out of guys who have game changing talent than to just jettison them and end up with a receiving corps of mediocre players who will hold your team back. It's more productive to figure out why you aren't getting better play out of your best talent and try and fix those issues.
Click to expand...
these guys were all disappointing because they all had one thing in common - crappy QBs
 
royalshank said:
these guys were all disappointing because they all had one thing in common - crappy QBs
Click to expand...

I think that getting the ball to Wallace is a weakness of Tannehill while he does have other strengths, but yes, QB influence is a constant for all of them.
 
so how was I wrong with anything I said about Wallace? only reason I got thumbs down in this thread was because I didn't blame tannehill.
 
Yessir said:
He didn't suck when he had Big Ben as his quarterback. I know that much.
Click to expand...

Yes he did. His numbers here aren't much different from last year. He tended to catch a few more TD's...but in reality he caught more passes here than in Pitt. This year he had more catches than any previous year!

I think people's expectations of the guy are just skewed...
 
Dr. Phin said:
Yes he did. His numbers here aren't much different from last year. He tended to catch a few more TD's...but in reality he caught more passes here than in Pitt. This year he had more catches than any previous year!

I think people's expectations of the guy are just skewed...
Click to expand...

Exactly. It's always the grass is greener on the other side, until they actually find out it's actually grown with the same sh**.
 
Here's what I know - you will likely never hear the name Wallace and spectacular catch in the same sentence.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yes he does, sorry but I take marshall over him 1 million times. The guy not once dove for the ball and rarely tried to make sure the defender did not come up with the ball.
 
I wouldn't say Wallace sucks. I would say that he has speed and occasionally gets open, which is his job. What I would say is that he does not have great hands, but most of all, I believe he is a total "me" guy. We saw that after game 1. We win and he complains he didn't get the ball. The guy has no heart and just wants it to be all about him. Maybe he gives a little more effort on jump balls or blocking (which he did none of this season) if he had a few more catches. I don't know. I wanted to like him because he could be a huge playmaker, but I just can't. "Me" guys are cancerous to a young team and QB. All season we hear that Tannehill and Hartline put in so much extra time. Where was Wallace? He doesn't care. He signed his huge deal, just like Reshad Jones did, and put in only the necessary practice time. Nothing extra. No heart.
 
I will do it for you, 36 - 10. I like Hartline, but saying Wallace sucks is foolish.
 
You can't win with some people. Don't bitch and moan about a deep threat then complain when you get him. It's not our faults why Ireland over paid for him, but if he didn't, you guys would bitch that we have no deep threat again for Tannehill and make excuses how he needs a guy to stretch the field for him to excel.
 
Hey Wallace17jocksniffer... Did you really just go through a bunch of random threads to find posts by me that to thumbs down because I gave you some much earned thumbs down in this thread? What are you, like 12 years old? I know your football IQ is that of a 12 year olds but seeriously son, that's juvanile. Or maybe I'm to believe that you happened to be digging through 10 different threads, some dating back as far as 6 months ago, and actually did disagee with them? Grow up boy.

I only thumb downed your more idiotic statements. If I were a petty child like you, I'd be digging through your post history and just randomly hitting the button.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom