Themajster
NYC FIN FAN
I thought he was a big playmaker everytime he was playing with us 2003. I'm still wondering why we didn't resign him for another year. I like T-Buck. If he comes with a decent price, get em.
Nah time to move foward, everything is about moving foward, forget the past no matter how good....I'd rather see a healthy Ty Law with a chip on his shoulder and something to proveFins 34 said:I know his name has been tossed around here a few times, but now it seems pertinent to discuss the possibility.
Interesting throught. I am not a football coach though, only an armchair QB.A&MPhin84 said:Ya know...bringing back T-Buck would be a good idea IMO, but what do y'all think about maybe trying him at FS as well? He's listed at only 180, so may be a tad small, but he's always been a playmaker who's good at reading and reacting to the QB, and im sure still has pretty good speed for a FS. That way, our depth problem at FS would be solved (IMO Bell will start, but what we have behind him scares me), as well as filling the CB hole that Poole left, since i dont trust Edwards any further than i can throw him either.
A&MPhin84 said:Ya know...bringing back T-Buck would be a good idea IMO, but what do y'all think about maybe trying him at FS as well? He's listed at only 180, so may be a tad small, but he's always been a playmaker who's good at reading and reacting to the QB, and im sure still has pretty good speed for a FS. That way, our depth problem at FS would be solved (IMO Bell will start, but what we have behind him scares me), as well as filling the CB hole that Poole left, since i dont trust Edwards any further than i can throw him either.
Theanswer385 said:hes very solid even at his age most def would pick him up for a year. he always makes plays
33-34ish..stoody24 said:how old is he??