Zounds, you're making yourself look more foolish with each post about reading comprehension. Go back 2 pages and read or just stop.That's a nice story, but nobody is suggesting that. Again, a complete failure at reading comprehension.
Zounds, you're making yourself look more foolish with each post about reading comprehension. Go back 2 pages and read or just stop.That's a nice story, but nobody is suggesting that. Again, a complete failure at reading comprehension.
Zounds, you're making yourself look more foolish with each post about reading comprehension. Go back 2 pages and read.
THIS!!!! See this is where ya have to start. All of this "we have to change" is no good without saying who you are changing to. Change for the sake of change is a recipe for absolute failure, EVERY TIME!!!! Don't tell me you want these people gone unless you point out who you want in their place. I have never seen many teams win a super bowl without a GM or coach.
Zounds, you're making yourself look more foolish with each post about reading comprehension. Go back 2 pages and read or just stop.
Don't tell me you want these people gone unless you point out who you want in their place.
Oh, even if he goes back and re-reads the post, im sure he wont see anything wrong with his interpretation. Thats the problem with those view the worlds through a lens of preconceived notions: whatever doesnt conform to it is to be fought at any cost.
Undoubtedly this will degenerate into a pissing contest as he continues to try and twist the narrative. If that doesnt work, he will engage in Ad Hominem tactics in an effort to undercut others credibility, or simply insult you in order to provoke a reaction. Finally, when his back is against the wall he will try and dismiss your posts as futile, irrelevant, or simply a waste of your time or everyone elses time.
Thus is the favorite ploys of the character assassin.
I stopped reading his posts ages ago, but from what i can gather by your and Harry's quotes hes trying to insist everyone else cant read. Hilarious.
Seems pretty cut and dry to me.
First of all, only he knows the meaning behind his words, all of us are interpreting his meaning.There's nothing foolish about being able to read. Here is exactly what he said since you are too lazy to look:
He doesn't say you cant criticize Ireland. He doesn't say you need to hold interviews for GMs. Where your friends in the peanut gallery got those ideas from KTOWN's post is beyond me.
What he does say, and what I reiterated, is that you need to consider the alternative and consequences of firing someone by looking at their replacement. Firing Ireland doesnt sound like a good idea if the alternative is someone like Randy Mueller or Rick Spielman. See the point he was making?
Pretty clear that his thoughts are if you don't offer a GMs name you don't have a right to an opinion. He also emphasizes that change for the sake of change is a bad idea. One hundred percent agree. But what gets lost here is the difference between team officials and fans. Fans don't interview GMs so this assumption your making as to that being his meaning is ridiculous.Don't tell me you want these people gone unless you point out who you want in their place.
Fans don't interview GMs so this assumption your making as to that being his meaning is ridiculous.
Obviously the goal when firing someone is to upgrade the position. But the analogy that Harry and Spesh made was right in line with my original response to your buddy (how dumb is it to say that) that if Peterson was making a list of candidates that means that a decision for change was made and the normal progression is to make that decision then determine which direction to go for the solution.I never made that assumption. That was an assumption added by your pal Spesh when he said he shouldn't have to interview a replacement. He assumed KTOWN was saying that. I thought it was ridiculous as well.
And there is a difference between demanding change and taking action. I'd still argue that before change is made, the alternative should always be considered.
So I take it you guys just want to fire Ireland as a punishment? or are you firing him in hopes to get someone better? If you chose the latter, well, that would then be considering the alternative.
10-6 season and Ireland is safe along with Philbin
9-7 season Irelands job is on the rocks and Philbin is oK
8-8 season and Ireland should be gone and Philbin will stick but his job is in jeapody the next year for sure
7-9 Ireland will be gone Philbin will still be here to start next years season but he better be looking over his shoulder becasue Ross will be.
Playoffs.
No playoffs means they are all gone
A new GM would want his own Head Coach. If Ireland is fired, Philbin is likely gone as well.
Agreed, with the extension of Ireland. The 4 main players (Ireland, Philbin, Sherman and Tannehill) are all tied to each other. One goes and they all go.