It all good brother. Sometimes we don't always think about the other person on the other side. Have a great weekend!Thank you for the civility and insight. But yeah lot of douchy posters/trolls here now. "Finheaven" or "Finhell?" People seem to forget what "forum" means and treat it instead as a psuedo "news flash." I just might have to consider your suggestion. Much thanks.
Nice post bro!:brewskis:Satele is not our weak link....our guards are....it is obvious.
Satele plays much better in our zone blocking scheme.
We shall see tomorrow as Samson isn't 100%.Guard.
The catch there is that Satele has never played another position on the line besides center. Pouncey has played guard and would be an immediate upgrade to RG where he played at UF. The, "he's a center", concrete train of thought doesn't make a lot of sense when you factor in all the benefits that moving Pouncey to guard provides. It would be a smart move considering we would have 4 positions of strength on the O-line instead of sending Satele to the bench and still leaving holes at both guard positions.
In a faint comparison, despite having Gibson and drafting Landry, no one was pissed off when we heard the Wallace was going to be moved around in Lazor's new offense and would play some snaps in the slot position. Similar situation though in that you want to play to your strengths and to what gives you the best chance to put your best players on the field.
Interestingly, Pouncey today said "guard is my natural position. I was forced to play center when I got drafted here." And you'll remember I wrote in my column a couple of weeks ago that Pouncey would be more than open to the move. The Pro Bowl center said he'd become a Pro Bowl guard if he were moved.