True but he lost more than he won, although I believe he is a good HC.
The problem with most on forums is they jump on bandwagons in the off with their heads and lynch mob mentality, without having any idea of who to replace people with. It is funny but true.
Its also funny how people believe fans should have the same answers as those who are paid millions of dollars to know these things. Give me millions of dollars, sources, access to interviews, and years of personal interactions with coaches and i have little doubt i could find us a winner.
That said, you'll note that i personally had an answer 2 minutes after your thread started. Ken Whisenhunt has proven to be a superior coach. Multiple teams have gone after him the 2 times he's been "available"(known and not a head coach) for hire, this offseason is his 3rd year and he stood a damn fine chance of landing the Texans job. Unfortunately(for him), he did such a superior job of coaching the Chargers offense that they made the playoffs and he has to wait to start up new interviews.
Whisenhunt's assistants have had success or are highly regarded and some of them are surprisingly available due to odd circumstances(Ray Horton should be free from Cleveland soon, Russ Grimm stayed home this past season). Not only could we have a head coach who has proven he can elevate talent, we could grab a handful of his preferred staff.
No doubt your response to this will be the point out his overall record. Thats due to his last few seasons in Arizona, which had an ungodly mess at the quarterback position. Granted, he owns that record. But its doesnt accurately reflect his abilities as a coach. Given a competent quarterback and he will get the most out of that player. Kurt Warner, Rapist, Philip Rivers, all performed quite well under him. He simply couldnt make Derek Anderson, Matt Leinhart, Kevin Kolb, and John Skelton into stars. I cant blame him when it comes to those guys. And yes, he handpicked Kolb, but hes a coach not a scout. With Tannehill, he wouldnt have a repeat problem.
Whisenhunt had had success wherever he has gone. With Miami, he could be in the best position since his Pittsburgh days. With a quarterback with potential and a fierce pass rush, Whisenhunt could be holding a Lombardi trophy above his head. How do i know? Because he came damned close without a pass rush and an older quarterback a year away from retirement.
Now, if you dont mind, answer me this: after 2 subpar years, can you see Philbin winning a Superbowl? If so, explain why? If you cant see him raising that trophy, explain why should we bother keeping him employed?