Raekwon The Che
Check out the grill...
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2005
- Messages
- 401
- Reaction score
- 0
- Age
- 38
Boston > Booker
Moulds still had over 1,000 w/ Flutie and Rob Johnson while having a running by committee and a horrible OL.Raekwon The Che said:Look at the QBs he has had :o If Chris Chambers had had an above average QB then he would have had a 1,000 yard season.
3 years ago.Raekwon The Che said:Boston > Booker
3 years ago.
Jerry Rice has better stats than anyone in the game, would you take him over Chambers this season?taylorj99 said:While that's the popular perception, take a look at both of their career stats. Both have only played 6 seasons including last year when Boston didn't play a down. Boston still has more yards, td's, and a better ypc ratio. Even his last year in San Diego, when he was playing at 265lbs., he caught 70 passes for 880 yards in 14 games. That's the same season that LT2 caught 100 balls. The talent is still there, he just needs to stay healthy. Don't get me wrong, I think Booker is talented too. He just got a raw deal in Chicago. Playing for a crappy team, with a front office that didn't like him either. Not a good situation to play within.
Given 80 or so catches, each of them would go over 1,000 yards. While I don't think it's likely, if we throw for 4,000 yards this year, two of our three starting receivers could have 1,000, the third about 650, McMichael about 700, Ronnie about 400, and 250 split up between everyone else.
Justasportsfan said:Jerry Rice has better stats than anyone in the game, would you take him over Chambers this season?
I used Chambers because he's the lesser wr between the 3 , Moulds, Evans and Chamberszachseau13 said:The more important question is would you take him over Moulds? :rofl3:
This is true. Chambers is a good wr, but has proven nothing. Until he does, I'll take both my guys before him.Justasportsfan said:I used Chambers because he's the lesser wr between the 3 , Moulds, Evans and Chambers![]()
Wagon Circler said:This is true. Chambers is a good wr, but has proven nothing. Until he does, I'll take both my guys before him.
I'll take past glory over no glory any day. By the way, Moulds just had another 1,000 yard season, so I'll take present glory. Possession receiver? LOL, moving on.zachseau13 said:You have a point Moulds has proven that he is an aging WR on the downside of a good career.
He was 41st in the league last year in yards per catch,
41st
He also proved to the among the least dangerous scoring receivers in the league - 5 TDS in 88 catches is among the lowest TD percentages of the top 50 WR's last year
He only got his 1,000 yards because of the number of times they threw him the ball
But keep hanging on to past glory
He has become a possession receiver.
Further, his yards per catch has been declining each of the past 6 years
BTW, you say that Chambers hasn't proven anything so you would rather have Evans - what the hell has Evans proven?
Wagon Circler said:I'll take past glory over no glory any day. By the way, Moulds just had another 1,000 yard season, so I'll take present glory. Possession receiver? LOL, moving on.
What has Evans proven? Uhhh, that he can amass 900+ yards and 9 touchdowns his ROOKIE year as a #2 guy?
You probably don't know much bout the bills. To prevent Drew from getting sacked, Moulds was made to run 5-10 yds routes from scrimmage. A role he usually didn't play since he was always the deep threat.zachseau13 said:You have a point Moulds has proven that he is an aging WR on the downside of a good career.
He was 41st in the league last year in yards per catch,
41st
See my first post. I'm still willing to bet teams will need to double team Moulds. Inspite of being the main focus of db's , he's still caught for over 1,000 yds. Teams this year will have to decide on who to double team, Moulds or Evans? This is why I think Mularkey took Parrish for another weapon up the middle and since Reed hasn't lived up to expectations ( Then again he was injured.)zachseau13 said:He also proved to the among the least dangerous scoring receivers in the league - 5 TDS in 88 catches is among the lowest TD percentages of the top 50 WR's last year
He only got his 1,000 yards because of the number of times they threw him the ball
But keep hanging on to past glory
He has become a possession receiver.
Further, his yards per catch has been declining each of the past 6 years
BTW, you say that Chambers hasn't proven anything so you would rather have Evans - what the hell has Evans proven?
Justasportsfan said:You probably don't know much bout the bills. To prevent Drew from getting sacked, Moulds was made to run 5-10 yds routes from scrimmage. A role he usually didn't play since he was always the deep threat.
In doing so, he attracted double teams up the middle which allowed Evans to break away and gain the long yards and TD's.
See my first post. I'm still willing to bet teams will need to double team Moulds. Inspite of being the main focus of db's , he's still caught for over 1,000 yds. Teams this year will have to decided on who to double team, Moulds or Evans? This is why I think Mularkey took Parrish for another weapon up the middle and since Reed hasn't lived up to expectations ( Then again he was injured.)
Only one player was able to guard Moulds in single coverage on a consistent basis and that was TY LAW.
It should be an interesting year for our wr's.