Who would have thought that MArk Sanchz would help lead Miami to a win lol

[nick1]

Yea I enjoyed watching Murray's super excited energy as he rolled his eyes and got frustrated with Sanchez tripping him. Even the WR's for the Eagles were pissed on half the throws he made (and it was visible).

Totally forgot about that. He tripped Murray at least 3 times. Way to lead your team Mark

 

[finz99]

That because the line didn't play well, not to mention the WR and the dropped passes and the inability to get their feet down...that WR fights for the ball Jones doesn't get the INT...Sanchez can't do everything...

Haha good joke man!

 

[FSU Truth]

Totally forgot about that. He tripped Murray at least 3 times. Way to lead your team Mark

Murray took poor angles

 

[nick1]

I forgot how much truth likes to troll sometimes.

 

[DuderinoN703]

what game were you watching? as soon as Sanchez came on he brought energy to that lifeless offense that had sputtered since the beginning of the game. He threw a strike to Austin who couldn't get his feet in(Austin would kill this team), he then threw another TD and it was called back. On the INT Austin didn't even look for the ball and stopped his route then on the final drive Austin is wide open and Sanchez makes a great decision and pass and Aiston just keeps running.

Mark played fine, he'll get blamed but he instantly brought energy to that O and gave his team a chance. Bradford kept Miami and in(and the Miami D which won the game for you), your QB wasn't good again and you are going to bash a backup that came in late and started moving the ball up and down the field?


w/ all this said I give your team a ton of credit and the coach a ton of credit. Miami quit early in the season and they were presented w/ another opportunity to quit which I thought they would but your HC rallied this team. VERY impressive by him and your team.

He brought so much energy to the team after Bradford's exit that Philly scored 3 points.

 

[nyjunc]

such a puke post.

sanchez looked exactly like he always looked. he can make plays, moves the ball well at times and manages to turn the ball over more times than he throws a touchdown. especially with the game on the line. i'm not going to bs and say tanne played one of his best games but he threw some strikes he threw a nice deep ball, and he made plays on third down when we had to seal the game late. the fact that you actually manage to discredit our qb play and in the same post try to tell me mark played fine is an absolute tribute to your dumb delusion with sanchez and bias when giving any sort of a backhanded compliment with a hint of opinion on qb plays.

i'm glad sanchez came in so he could be exactly who he's always been.

how many times has he turned it over w/ the game on the line? not many. and that was more on the WR than the QB, Austin killed them. he has had TO issues obviously and he always will but he's always been a guy that has come through late more often than not and he was well on his way but he needs guys to catch the ball.

Sanchez came in and gave Philly a chance. Philly's last offensive point was w/ about 5 mins to go in the 1st qtr. they had 7 empty possessions after that before mark came in. Mark's 1st possession was marred by a penalty but possession #2 he drove them right down the field trailing by 4 and threw 2 balls that should have been TDs. One to Austin who couldn't get his 2nd foot down and one to Ertz for a TD that they called back. they pulled w/in 1, 2 possessions later he has them on the verge of a TD and the WR stops running and makes no attempt at the ball. Picked off. Philly gets the ball back and perfect throw to Austin and Austin doesn't look, perfect throw to Murray and Murray drops it but clearly it was mark's fault for bringing down that juggernaut of an O.

 

[FSU Truth]

He brought so much energy to the team after Bradford's exit that Philly scored 3 points.

It was truly electrifying...

 

[DuderinoN703]

Face facts...Sanchez out played Tannehill...the Dolphins outplayed the Eagles

14 for 23 for 156 yds and an INT is considered outplaying Tannehill? That explains why Tannehill's QBR was 30 pts higher. Granted the Landry TD was pure luck aside from that his game wasn't ****ty.

 

[nyjunc]

He brought so much energy to the team after Bradford's exit that Philly scored 3 points.

from the missed FG until Bradford got hurt Philly's possessions went like this:

5 plays 17 yds, blocked punt
3 plays -17 yds, punt
7 plays 21 yds, punt
2 plays 23 yds(INT was wiped out on penalty), half
6 plays 42 yds, punt
4 plays 22 yds, punt
2 plays -5 yds Bradford hurt. Sanchez comes in 3rd and 15 and Philly converts.

5 plays 14 yds, punt
15 plays, 61 yds, FG
5 plays 22 yds, punt
6 plays 41 yds, punt
6 plays, 21 yds, downs

103 yds for Bradford led Eagles on 7 drives, 159 yds w/ Sanchez on 5 drives but nah Sanchez didn't bring anything. it was all his fault they couldn't score in the 2nd and 3rd qtrs when he wasn't in.

 

[phishxhead]

how many times has he turned it over w/ the game on the line? not many. and that was more on the WR than the QB, Austin killed them. he has had TO issues obviously and he always will but he's always been a guy that has come through late more often than not and he was well on his way but he needs guys to catch the ball.

Sanchez came in and gave Philly a chance. Philly's last offensive point was w/ about 5 mins to go in the 1st qtr. they had 7 empty possessions after that before mark came in. Mark's 1st possession was marred by a penalty but possession #2 he drove them right down the field trailing by 4 and threw 2 balls that should have been TDs. One to Austin who couldn't get his 2nd foot down and one to Ertz for a TD that they called back. they pulled w/in 1, 2 possessions later he has them on the verge of a TD and the WR stops running and makes no attempt at the ball. Picked off. Philly gets the ball back and perfect throw to Austin and Austin doesn't look, perfect throw to Murray and Murray drops it but clearly it was mark's fault for bringing down that juggernaut of an O.

I don't know what game some other people where watching, but Sanchez came off the bench and looked much better than either of the 2 QBs that started the game. Will be interesting to see how he plays if he gets the start next week.

 

[nyjunc]

14 for 23 for 156 yds and an INT is considered outplaying Tannehill? That explains why Tannehill's QBR was 30 pts higher. Granted the Landry TD was pure luck aside from that his game wasn't ****ty.

First off he is joking but he could be serious. the best QB on the field yesterday was Sanchez though he wasn't great. he did elevate that team, gave them energy and gave them a chance.

 

[Ben Had]

how many times has he turned it over w/ the game on the line?

Of course it wasn't his fault last year with the play offs on the line throwing a game clinching int...

His play yesterday is what he is.

 

[phishxhead]

14 for 23 for 156 yds and an INT is considered outplaying Tannehill? That explains why Tannehill's QBR was 30 pts higher. Granted the Landry TD was pure luck aside from that his game wasn't ****ty.

Just watching the game, Sanchez threw the ball down the field better than RT or Bradford yesterday.

 

[SCLSU Mud Dogs]

First off he is joking but he could be serious. the best QB on the field yesterday was Sanchez though he wasn't great. he did elevate that team, gave them energy and gave them a chance.

Is that why Sanchez threw the game-sealing interception? :idk:

 

[nyjunc]

Of course it wasn't his fault last year with the play offs on the line throwing a game clinching int...

His play yesterday is what he is.

he gets his share of the blame for last year though against that O scored almost a TD more per game. Do we forget his K missed 2 chip shots in a close game but it's all on mark, right? either way he deserves some blame, it's not like he led his O to 7 pts in 2 complete games w/ the season on the line but he deserved some blame.

He made the mistake of trusting a WR he shouldn't have trusted so he gets blame for that. They had another shot after the INT and he made the mistake of trusting that WR again and it burned him again. If Austin makes that catch Philly would probably have been in FG range to win it. you can't throw it and catch it.

---------- Post added at 01:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:18 PM ----------

Is that why Sanchez threw the game-sealing interception? :idk:

except the game wasn't sealed after that INT.