finjim
☠️ Banned ☠️
They have Sanchez, advantage Miami.
Spiller made the Jets D look like swiss cheese...and Bush>Spiller talent wise in my opinion!! (Plus Score, I have both on my fantasy team ;D )
After watching the coaches film on the Jets vs. Steelers game, this game is going to come down to Tannehill's mobility in the pocket, can he effectively move around and buy extra time and find the open guy. The rush the Jets were able to put on the Steelers were phenomenal, but the mobility and headiness of Ben is what allowed the Steelers offense to be effective. And I would expect the Jet's to be even more relentless this week.
what do the games fromlast year mean? you have a new QB, new coaching staff, new WRs, new team and you were blown out in week 1 before playing a bad team at home in week 2.
Jets 29 points a game
Phins 22.5 points a game
I like him so far
So now you're back!!?? You spent 2 weeks on both this forum & the Pat's forum talking ****e about how the Jills were going to crush the Jets and as soon as that ass whoopin was handed to your boys, you disapeared from both forums for 2 weeks.:boohoo: Now, because your sorry team won a game you want to come back and talk ****e again? Pathetic. You have zero credibility.The Jests D seems to be slightly overrated. They got lucky with TOs against the Bills, but yeah, Spiller shredded them on the ground. They couldn't stop Pitt's passing game, and they couldn't get off the field, giving up 9 and 10 play drives in the first half (Pitt scored on 3 of its 4 first half possessions). The Stillers were something like 8-for-13 on third down! Pitt had no running game to speak of, so it could have been worse.
The thing is that the Stillers OL is NOT very good. They took OL in the first and second rounds in 2012, but they lost their first round rookie, RG Dave DeCastro, in preseason, and LT Mike Adams has struggled as rookies will. The Bills have a much better OL than Pitt, and the Jets were NOT nearly as successful getting pressure.
The Jests LBs struggled to set the edge against both the Bills and the Stillers. If the Fins run the ball, and limit Tannehill's exposure to the Jests blitzes, I think the Fins can score enough points to beat the Jests because the Jests can't run for manure, and Sanchez is, well, Sanchez.
:sidelol: Games from last season mean much more than games from 2 or 3 years ago, but that doesn't seem to stop you from continually bragging on how great Sanchez and the Jests were back in 2009 and 2010.
The Jests D seems to be slightly overrated. They got lucky with TOs against the Bills, but yeah, Spiller shredded them on the ground. They couldn't stop Pitt's passing game, and they couldn't get off the field, giving up 9 and 10 play drives in the first half (Pitt scored on 3 of its 4 first half possessions). The Stillers were something like 8-for-13 on third down! Pitt had no running game to speak of, so it could have been worse.
The thing is that the Stillers OL is NOT very good. They took OL in the first and second rounds in 2012, but they lost their first round rookie, RG Dave DeCastro, in preseason, and LT Mike Adams has struggled as rookies will. The Bills have a much better OL than Pitt, and the Jets were NOT nearly as successful getting pressure.
The Jests LBs struggled to set the edge against both the Bills and the Stillers. If the Fins run the ball, and limit Tannehill's exposure to the Jests blitzes, I think the Fins can score enough points to beat the Jests because the Jests can't run for manure, and Sanchez is, well, Sanchez.
:sidelol: Games from last season mean much more than games from 2 or 3 years ago, but that doesn't seem to stop you from continually bragging on how great Sanchez and the Jests were back in 2009 and 2010.
There is no such thing as "very unique". Something is either unique, or it is not. And Sanchez will screw up.It makes sense......but Ben is very unique in his ability to extend the play. I really don't think another QB in the leaque (outside of the "running qb" has that ability. Jets should have had 7 sacks that game.....but they missed a lot, and as you said, Ben is tuff to get down. Tannehill won't be that elusive
It was a 3 pt game at the half, we had chances even in the 4th. Don't let the final score fool you and Pitt missed some key guys but we were missing the best defensive player in the game along w/ another defensive starter plus sanchez's favoite target o offense and lost our starting RBb for half the game so spare me the nonsense about Pitt's injuries.
I think you're right, I think Tannehill's going to see a boatload of defenders coming his way all game long. The key will be how effective that rush is and how well our secondary plays. If we can rattle Tannehill early and force him into throwing the ball early, I think we get 2 picks on Sunday.
wow....you certainly took me to taskPosts # 171 & 172 = Ad Homonym (big word I know, look it up children) - You lose. Game over. And if he has zero credibility than you two clowns must be floating around -10.
This will be a good matchup as it is every year, twice a year. I’m hoping for a win but it could go either way with a close final score. If we can ride Reggie for 60 minutes, Tannehill limits his mistakes and makes a key 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] down conversion or two and Snatchez plays down to his usual level there’s no reason Miami can’t win it.
Ill do my best in future posts to take your criticism seriously There is no such thing as "very unique". Something is either unique, or it is not. And Sanchez will screw up.
We'll see if you are back on Monday to update those numbers.