Fineas
Premium Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2005
- Messages
- 2,221
- Reaction score
- 294
The problem is less the quality of the QBs than the system. Before last year, the Fins were attempting about 450 passes a year. Most NFL teams are closer to 550. If 60% of those extra 100 passes are completed, that's 60 more completed passes for the season.
The extra 60 completions for the team are pretty big. A No. 1 receiver will usualy get around 25-35% of his team's completions. With 60 extra completions, that's an extra 15-20 catches and another 200-300 yards. In other words, the difference between a 65 rec., 900 yard season and an 85 catch 1200 yard season. That's basically the difference, production-wise, between a Chambers and an Owens, Ward, etc.
The next part that plays into it is the nature of the team's passing game. Some teams throw almost all of their passes to WRs. Others use their RBs and TEs a lot. Last year, the Fins attempted a lot more passes, but completed 86 of them to TEs. That's a pretty big number. If you look at the other WRs that have put up big reception numbers on bad teams with bad QBs (including Booker and Boston), you'll generally see that they rarely throw to the TE and throw most of their passes to the WRs. Similarly, look at the reception numbers for the no. 1 receivers on teams with the top receiving TEs: SD/Gates (47), KC/Gonzalez (62), NYG/Shockey (51), MIA/McMichael (69), Min (68), ATL (45). TEs take receptions away from WRs and you rarely see a team with a TE who puts up big receiving numbers and WRs who do the same. If 45 of those completions to Fins TEs went to WRs and Chambers got 25-35% of them, that would be an extra 10-15 catches.
That said, and while I think there are legitimate reasons why Chambers hasn't put up the huge numbers, there do seem to be more games than there should be where he just kinda disappears. Hopefully, he'll step it up this year.
The extra 60 completions for the team are pretty big. A No. 1 receiver will usualy get around 25-35% of his team's completions. With 60 extra completions, that's an extra 15-20 catches and another 200-300 yards. In other words, the difference between a 65 rec., 900 yard season and an 85 catch 1200 yard season. That's basically the difference, production-wise, between a Chambers and an Owens, Ward, etc.
The next part that plays into it is the nature of the team's passing game. Some teams throw almost all of their passes to WRs. Others use their RBs and TEs a lot. Last year, the Fins attempted a lot more passes, but completed 86 of them to TEs. That's a pretty big number. If you look at the other WRs that have put up big reception numbers on bad teams with bad QBs (including Booker and Boston), you'll generally see that they rarely throw to the TE and throw most of their passes to the WRs. Similarly, look at the reception numbers for the no. 1 receivers on teams with the top receiving TEs: SD/Gates (47), KC/Gonzalez (62), NYG/Shockey (51), MIA/McMichael (69), Min (68), ATL (45). TEs take receptions away from WRs and you rarely see a team with a TE who puts up big receiving numbers and WRs who do the same. If 45 of those completions to Fins TEs went to WRs and Chambers got 25-35% of them, that would be an extra 10-15 catches.
That said, and while I think there are legitimate reasons why Chambers hasn't put up the huge numbers, there do seem to be more games than there should be where he just kinda disappears. Hopefully, he'll step it up this year.