WR Situation
- Thread starter Todd347347
- Start date
YAC is what its all about ehh? Try catching the ball is what its all about cause u cant go anywhere with it if u dont have it. Thats why Booker is so important to our team. We need someone who we know we can rely on to catch the ball and get us the 7 yards from his slants and hitches then everything else is bonus.
And I know DT is inconsistant but i think ur underrating him a little bit. there is no way he is worse than number 5.. I think he might even be able to hold down number 4 unless gilmore has some more good games.
And I know DT is inconsistant but i think ur underrating him a little bit. there is no way he is worse than number 5.. I think he might even be able to hold down number 4 unless gilmore has some more good games.
ChambersSaban2005 said:
Booker
Boston
Gilmore
Welker
Boston isn't up to number 2 receiver. Gilmore will be keeping Boston pushing to be better, because I believe Gilmore will be ground. Thompson wasn't mentioned due I think he is gaining ground. Welker will be on sp Teams, and will be used situationaly on offense.
Mike13
I am a golden god
Saban2005 said:
Thats the key phrase in your sentence. I think Boston will our No. 3 guy which is good because Linnehan uses alot of 3 WR sets. Im sure we can use Welker in passing plays it would be cool to give him the ball.
XXXSURTAINXXX
THE SACRIFICIAL DOLPHIN
Saban2005 said:
Trade Booker for some talent at CB and switch Welker and Gilmore and Im feeling it.
I like Booker. My question is if you trade Booker, and Boston can't stay healthy, where is the team then?XXXSURTAINXXX said:
XXXSURTAINXXX
THE SACRIFICIAL DOLPHIN
Fin Fan in Cali said:
Simple....Kendall Newsome or DT.....Booker is no better than DT IMHTGO. He shows no loyalty to our team.
Boston needs just one year...That year is this year...I got faith he will lead our team in receptions.
His health? It's a concern of mine as well....but Im looking at Saban's tactics....They dont hit in practice like they did when JJ and DW was at the helm.......That will add to that guys recovery and reinvention of the biggest and the baddest muthafuqqin Wide reciever in the Nation Football League.
Yeah.
I am not sure Newsome is ready, and Dt might not make the team. Mann and Davis might sneak in there or at least one of them will make the practice squad. Booker is going to have a breakout year in a Fins uniform. I have that feeling. Boston is going to have to work even harder to learn anew play book as the rest of them are, but getting used to being on the field again. I hope Boston makes it through the year healthy. I just think its too early to even think about unloading Booker, unless you see alot of other players step it up. I would be against Booker being traded. Farmer might fit into the mix too.XXXSURTAINXXX said:Simple....Kendall Newsome or DT.....Booker is no better than DT IMHTGO. He shows no loyalty to our team.<-----He still cries at night.
Boston needs just one year...That year is this year...I got faith he will lead our team in receptions.
His health? It's a concern of mine as well....but Im looking at Saban's tactics....They dont hit in practice like they did when JJ and DW was at the helm.......That will add to that guys recovery and reinvention of the biggest and the baddest muthafuqqin Wide reciever in the Nation Football League.
Yeah.
XXXSURTAINXXX
THE SACRIFICIAL DOLPHIN
Fin Fan in Cali said:
I hear your concerns.....Im trying to buy into Saban's defense.....But Howard is more of a risk then Booker is an asset. The benefit in trading Booker might outweigh the cost.
Of course sir Im just a die hard fan at home on my PC and my opinions might impress my wife and kids.......(The dont know any better)
I hear you, and agree about Howard. I just think that Booker is going to be the man this year, and if this is so, we will be able to spread defenses very thin with Chambers, Booker, Boston, and Gilmore.XXXSURTAINXXX said:
XXXSURTAINXXX
THE SACRIFICIAL DOLPHIN
I hope he does...if we can put up enough points to win(Like St. Louis and unlike KC) im with it.
We do have an impressive offensive corp when you think of it.
We do have an impressive offensive corp when you think of it.
Yes we do, and I am confiedent that it will come together. If the front 7 on D can get pressure, then I think we can manage with our Db's, watching the wavier wire of course. However if the front 7 can't get enough pressure then you will be right, we will have to trade some depth somewhere on the roster to get help at DB!XXXSURTAINXXX said:
Timmy54
Not a 3am Member but still post whoring
byroan said:
have to agree with that!
I really want to see Kendall Newson make this team. He is raw, but he can make catches as spectacular as any WR we have minus Chambers. He is a good talent, and I'd like a roster spot to go to him instead of Thompson, who has been given too many chances and is no longer needed.
I hear you. Gilmore has probably got number 4 slot now, and if they count Welker as number 5 then it will be to the practice squad for him. If Welker is not counted as a WR, then there is hope.Sirspud said: