i'm sure he'll be ranked high real soon if he plays like last sunday
nyjunc said:It's ONE game, older players can have a great game or 2 but they lack the consistency, same thing w/ Seau. he can look great 1 game and mediocre the next. That's just the way things go. If Zach can keep this up all year I'll admit my mistake but to me at his age and w/ the pounding he has taken he has to prove he can still play at a high level for 16 games.
Wildbill3 said:I have said this name before and I'll say it again, Clay matthews.
nyjunc said:He outperformed Vilma in ONE category and that is the misleading stat of tackles, they both had 2 sacks and Vilma had 3 INts to none for Zach and Vilma had a TD.
tay0365 said:Actually he was better in passes defended, and tackles per game, tackles, and he did this with three less games.
2004....... Games...Tackles....... TPG... Sacks.....PDG..... INT
Thomas.... 13............118........... 9....... 2..........4... . . 0
Vilma....... 16....... ... 80........ ... 5.... ... 2.......... 2... .. 2
nyjunc said:3 less games and 1 less start plus the near 100 more rushes aginst his team for more tackle opportunities.
Guys: I have never said zach isn't good or that he was done, I merely said he is not as good today as a few years ago and I don't think it's really arguable. I think if you ask zach he'll tell you the same thing. I very well could be wrong and he could have an excellent season, at worst i expect a solid year from him w/ a few ups and downs. I respect Zach, he's a warrior out there. I don't like him b/c he is a dolphin but I respect what he does and what he has done but anyone who says they'd rather have a 30+ yr old Zach over a 2nd yr Vilma is crazy.
tay0365 said:You said that Vilma had a better year then Zach, and I just thought that was wrong and proved it....that's all. I am not attacking you for being a Jets fan and or preferring your players over your opponents, I do the same thing (When it is reasonable.....I am not going to tell you that Feeley is better the Chad).
Vilma is a very good talent, and show potential to one day be as good as Zach, but sorry to say he is still not there (yes, even the older version Zach). I agree that Zach is on the decline, but he is still better then the majority of the other teams M-linebacker, and when he is done, I believe we have a very good replacement for him in Crowder (Unless he shows to be such a force on the outside, that will make it tough to bring him inside).
For now be excited on having such a good talent like Vilma on your team, but also try not to compare him with elite players just yet, but maybe one day you will be able to.
nyjunc said:I think it's safe to move on from this debate, we both have MLB's we are happy w/. Let's hope we see a good game on Sunday w/ the good guys in green coming out on top :)
nyjunc said:Guys: I have never said zach isn't good or that he was done, I merely said he is not as good today as a few years ago and I don't think it's really arguable. I think if you ask zach he'll tell you the same thing. I very well could be wrong and he could have an excellent season, at worst i expect a solid year from him w/ a few ups and downs. I respect Zach, he's a warrior out there. I don't like him b/c he is a dolphin but I respect what he does and what he has done but anyone who says they'd rather have a 30+ yr old Zach over a 2nd yr Vilma is crazy.
nyjunc said:I think it's safe to move on from this debate, we both have MLB's we are happy w/. Let's hope we see a good game on Sunday w/ the good guys in green coming out on top :)
Nick is God said:No you haven't said he was never good, but you have insisted he was never great which is just unthinkable that someone would suggest that idea and you have implied that because he was over 30 that he was incapable of playing his best football which I showed that was not the case for many other defensive players who have excelled after the age of 30 and in some cases have had their best seasons.
I could honestly care less if Vilma is better than Zach, really, what my beef is during this whole thread all you have done is sell Thomas short as a great linebacker which to any football observer would find totally absurd, even so you are starting to back off that stance a little in this post which is a start.