Booker?

[DBoston80]

Not as much as Chris "Butterfingers" Chambers. Booker has had 2 100yd games this year. If we had a QB.....he would put up nice numbers.

Poor excuse, Chambers is lite years better than Booker the slouch.

 

[Jimmy James]

Wow real nice comeback...OSU would dominate any team from Ver-gin-ya..

And? Who says I care about that.

The bottom line is that whoever said you have been against Booker from the start is exactly right. You apparently just couldn't get over that he was pissed off the Bears traded him like the rest of us could.

 

[Jimmy James]

Poor excuse, Chambers is lite years better than Booker the slouch.

I just had to capture this for posterity. I'd assume this was humor if not for your affection for OSU and if not for the fact that you're suggesting a receiver with ZERO Pro Bowl appearances and ZERO 1000 yard seasons is better than a receiver with a Pro Bowl appearance and TWO 1000 yard seasons.

 

[DBoston80]

And? Who says I care about that.

The bottom line is that whoever said you have been against Booker from the start is exactly right. You apparently just couldn't get over that he was pissed off the Bears traded him like the rest of us could.

Nothing wouldve made me forgive him like a little old fashioned production, he didnt, he hasn't...I have NO reason to give him the benefit of the doubt, he's had a terrible year.

 

[DBoston80]

I just had to capture this for posterity. I'd assume this was humor if not for your affection for OSU and if not for the fact that you're suggesting a receiver with ZERO Pro Bowl appearances and ZERO 1000 yard seasons is better than a receiver with a Pro Bowl appearance and TWO 1000 yard seasons.

If you wanna go on past stats then you HAVE to say Boston is better than both! I like to live in the now....

 

[Avalanche of Wins]

booker is slow, drops to many balls, and doesnt get seperation from db's i wish we never traded for booker, i would have rather had straight up picks for ogun

 

[DBoston80]

booker is slow, drops to many balls, and doesnt get seperation from db's i wish we never traded for booker, i would have rather had straight up picks for ogun

Even though your exactly right..prepare for unlogical verbal bashings by Booker apologists.

 

[Daytona Fin]

i'll take chambers over booker anyday

 

[Jimmy James]

booker is slow, drops to many balls, and doesnt get seperation from db's i wish we never traded for booker, i would have rather had straight up picks for ogun

Leaving aside your analysis of Booker because I think you know I differ in my analysis and because it really isn't the interesting part of what you said anyway, I think we all would have rather had straight up picks looking back at it. We might have a QB at this point had that worked out. Unfortunately, that's not what anybody offered us. I will agree with you that the situation should have been handled better (likely with a draft day trade for whatever the team could get), but you can't blame Booker himself for that.

 

[Jimmy James]

If you wanna go on past stats then you HAVE to say Boston is better than both! I like to live in the now....

Do I also have to say that Jerry Rice is better than both? Rice and Boston have pretty much an equal chance of ever having an impact on the NFL in any way again.

 

[DBoston80]

Leaving aside your analysis of Booker because I think you know I differ in my analysis and because it really isn't the interesting part of what you said anyway, I think we all would have rather had straight up picks looking back at it. We might have a QB at this point had that worked out. Unfortunately, that's not what anybody offered us. I will agree with you that the situation should have been handled better (likely with a draft day trade for whatever the team could get), but you can't blame Booker himself for that.

I think he's blaming Booker for being unproductive on Sundays...Call me crazy but thats what it sounds like to me?:confused:

 

[Jimmy James]

Even though your exactly right..prepare for unlogical verbal bashings by Booker apologists.

Oh, I love it. First, it was "lite". Now we get "unlogical".

Do you *attend* OSU? :rofl3:

 

[DBoston80]

Do I also have to say that Jerry Rice is better than both? Rice and Boston have pretty much an equal chance of ever having an impact on the NFL in any way again.

If Booker's production is your idea of "Impact"...I'll take that as a compliment.

 

[DBoston80]

Oh, I love it. First, it was "lite". Now we get "unlogical".

Do you *attend* OSU? :rofl3:

Would you rather be wrong about your spelling, or Wrong about Booker?

 

[Jimmy James]

Would you rather be wrong about your spelling, or Wrong about Booker?

Fortunately for me, you cover both of them darn well. You're the only guy I think I have ever encountered online who is so down on a receiver capable of posting up 100 yard games.