****Colts @ Ravens / Seahawks @ Redskins Game Thread**** | Page 3 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

****Colts @ Ravens / Seahawks @ Redskins Game Thread****

To be fair all we know is that
1) Ray Lewis gets into a fight
2) A couple of people got stabbed to death
3) ???????????????????????????
4) Profit!

Supposedly he tried to break the fight up, but if he was involved in the fight itself but didnt stab anyone that at least makes him an accessory to the crime right?
either way the whole thing is murky.
And the fact that everyone all of the sudden forgets about this incident because its his last year is just funny to me.

You have to take the good with the bad, Why cant the analysts just say "Ray Lewis was a great MLB, who may or may not have killed someone."

Damn straight on the first parts. Even if he tried to break up the fight which is completely questionable, the man was an accessory to murder. We know a group of people he was with got into a fight with other people and 2 men wound up stabbed to death. Afterwards Lewis washed his clothing, plead guilty to obstruction, and paid a boatload of money to the victims families. Those are facts.

I take nothing away from Lewis' performance on the field. He was outstanding. The guy is one of the great LBs of all time.

Having said that, I dont expect announcers to, nor do I think announcers should bring up that incident he was involved in. But, it would be nice if they didnt wax poetic 24/7 about what a great person Ray Lewis is. Its just not neccessary. If they would keep it to the fact he is a great player and on the field leader, it wouldnt bother me so much. He has earned praise for those things. But, I can do without everyone talking about how Ray Lewis is this great man. I get sick of seeing cameras in front of him all the time. Almost everyone in prison talks about God all of the time too. Enough already with this myth of Ray Lewis being of great character. ESPN is the worst for it and they even gave him a job. I will not be watching ESPN's coverage when they have this guy on their show as a paid employee.
 
Joyce raised Richard Lollar, who was left dead in the street in the early morning hours on Jan. 31, 2000, — a few hours after the Rams defeated the Titans in one of the most thrilling Super Bowls in history. And then came one of the most chilling post-Super Bowl scenes in history. A brawl outside the Cobalt Lounge, an upscale Atlanta nightclub, turned into gory spectacle of steely knives, mangled flesh and a river of blood. The 24-year-old Lollar and his 21-year-old boyhood buddy from Akron, Jacinth Baker, were both stabbed multiple times in the heart, the knives savagely twisted into their vital organs. The killers knew exactly what they were doing.

Lewis, his two good friends — Reginald Oakley and Joseph Sweeting — and nine others sped away from the crime scene in a 40-foot Lincoln limousine. Lewis, Oakley and Sweeting were charged with the killings and cleared in a controversial court decision that still leaves many questions unanswered.

Why, when Lewis made an appearance at a sporting goods store the day before the Super Bowl, did his friends buy knives at the store?

Why did witnesses say the limo pulled over and someone dumped bloody clothes into a trash bin?

Why was the white suit Ray Lewis wore that night never found?

Why did the limo driver change his story mid-trial after originally testifying that Lewis told everyone to "just keep your mouth shut and don't say nothing"? Originally, the driver told police he saw Lewis actively taking part in the bloody brawl and heard Oakley and Sweeting admit to stabbing someone. But he backed off those statements when he got on the witness stand.

Why did prosecutors reduce the murder charge against Lewis to misdemeanor obstruction of justice? It was a plea deal in which Lewis agreed to testify against his two friends, Oakley and Sweeting, who were later acquitted after Lewis' testimony failed to implicate them in the murders.

"Why were people changing their stories?" Joyce Lollar asked on the way to the cemetery that day. "… The jury didn't know who or what to believe. By lying and deceiving from the beginning Ray Lewis helped set everybody free."

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/os-mike-bianchi-ray-lewis-0106-20130105,0,1707256.column
 
you couldn't pay me to take either of those qbs on display tonight over tannehill...


You can't be serious? First off you can't compare what you seen in a regular season game to the playoffs. It's a much different tighter, grind. Teams usually win by making the least mistakes. Secondly, you shouldn't mention Tannehill right now in the same sentence with those two. It's not fair to RT. They aren't putting up rookie numbers, they are ranked up there with the best in the NFL.

"Both Griffin and Wilson are in the top five in the league with quarterback ratings of 102.4 and 100.0 respectively"

Both of these guys are very special, future superstars of the NFL. RG3 was banged up, but he'll get healthy in the offseason. I agree the wear and tear is a bit concerning. Wilson is light-years ahead of RT in maturity and field-intelligience right now. You notice how he never turns the ball over? He never forces passes. He does whatever is required to win. The guy eats, sleeps and breathes football, he's just a winner.

The jury is still very much out on Tannehill. Although there have been a few glimpses, he hasn't proven enough yet.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
People just hate on RG3 because of the media hype. Newsflash, RG3 is not paying ESPN to do this, ESPN does this themselves. Don't let the media circus cloud your judgment. RG3's talent and athleticism hasn't been seen at the quarterback position in so long. Michael Vick wishes he could be as accurate as this guy throwing the ball. I'd say he's a much faster version of Steve McNair. Which is a franchise caliber quarterback.
 
The problem is that he cant play like he's invincible all the time.
He will have a short career if he continuues to do so.
 
You can't be serious? First off you can't compare what you seen in a regular season game to the playoffs. It's a much different tighter, grind. Teams usually win by making the least mistakes. Secondly, you shouldn't mention Tannehill right now in the same sentence with those two. It's not fair to RT. They aren't putting up rookie numbers, they are ranked up there with the best in the NFL.

"Both Griffin and Wilson are in the top five in the league with quarterback ratings of 102.4 and 100.0 respectively"

Both of these guys are very special, future superstars of the NFL. RG3 was banged up, but he'll get healthy in the offseason. I agree the wear and tear is a bit concerning. Wilson is light-years ahead of RT in maturity and field-intelligience right now. You notice how he never turns the ball over? He never forces passes. He does whatever is required to win. The guy eats, sleeps and breathes football, he's just a winner.

The jury is still very much out on Tannehill. Although there have been a few glimpses, he hasn't proven enough yet.

i'm dead serious...i've seen enough of all 3 qbs to say i would take tannehill and his future over either of these qbs hands down...
 
i'm dead serious...i've seen enough of all 3 qbs to say i would take tannehill and his future over either of these qbs hands down...

I guess to each his own. I'll leave you with this, which is really all that matters. Impact!:

2011

Washington: 5-11
Indianapolis: 2-14
Seattle: 7-9
Miami: 6-10


2012

Washington: 10-6
Indianapolis: 11-5
Seattle: 11-5
Miami: 7-9

And don't give me this BS that they all had better tools! Aside from Seattle (with Lynch) our pieces were on par with the other 2 teams. We had a very strong defense and a ridiculously soft schedule. We'll see if you still feel the same way about the quarterbacks after next season when we finish 8-8 (if we're lucky) and miss the playoffs yet again.
 
I guess to each his own. I'll leave you with this, which is really all that matters. Impact!:

2011

Washington: 5-11
Indianapolis: 2-14
Seattle: 7-9
Miami: 6-10


2012

Washington: 10-6
Indianapolis: 11-5
Seattle: 11-5
Miami: 7-9

And don't give me this BS that they all had better tools! Aside from Seattle (with Lynch) our pieces were on par with the other 2 teams. We had a very strong defense and a ridiculously soft schedule. We'll see if you still feel the same way about the quarterbacks after next season when we finish 8-8 (if we're lucky) and miss the playoffs yet again.

first off i don't float bs...and when rg3 is done in 5 years cause of all that contact in that o remember i told ya...as for telling me miamis weapons on o were on the same level as every other team minus seattles...lmao...that's crazy talk

indys got wayne and allen and hilton and fleener off the top of my head...all 4 bigger playmakers than any wr or te we have...washington a lot of that is product of the o generated production but garcon is a bigger play maker by far than anything we have...most those other guys make plays cause of the run threat and defending the read option sucking up the lbs and getting banged off pa etc...different o can't even really compare it to miamis in any way
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I guess to each his own. I'll leave you with this, which is really all that matters. Impact!:

2011

Washington: 5-11
Indianapolis: 2-14
Seattle: 7-9
Miami: 6-10


2012

Washington: 10-6
Indianapolis: 11-5
Seattle: 11-5
Miami: 7-9

And don't give me this BS that they all had better tools! Aside from Seattle (with Lynch) our pieces were on par with the other 2 teams. We had a very strong defense and a ridiculously soft schedule. We'll see if you still feel the same way about the quarterbacks after next season when we finish 8-8 (if we're lucky) and miss the playoffs yet again.


This isn't the most fair comparison because:

1. Washington literally had Rex Grossman and John Beck at QB last season.
2. Indianapolis literally had Curtis ****ing Painter at QB last season.
3. Seattle had, uhm, Tarvaris Jackson and Charlie Whitehurst?


Not one of those guys could sniff Matt Moore's jock strap.

Never mind that Miami traded away its top WR while Indy resigned its best WR while drafting a young stud, Washington spent big bucks on Pierre Garcon, etc.
 
Thing is with RG3, you take the running part of his game out, and you're left with pretty average QB... And that offense he's running is already taking a toll on his legs... Doesnt bode well...
 
This isn't the most fair comparison because:

1. Washington literally had Rex Grossman and John Beck at QB last season.
2. Indianapolis literally had Curtis ****ing Painter at QB last season.
3. Seattle had, uhm, Tarvaris Jackson and Charlie Whitehurst?


Not one of those guys could sniff Matt Moore's jock strap.

Never mind that Miami traded away its top WR while Indy resigned its best WR while drafting a young stud, Washington spent big bucks on Pierre Garcon, etc.

not that matt moores much better than even average but he's definitely way better than any of those guys you mentioned...
 
Sportsbooks got buried tonight, with Alabama covering on top of the four NFL favorites all covering. I talked to some guys in the industry tonight and they said only the Bengals game saved the sportsbooks from a complete disaster. There was a late opinion on the Bengals, driving that number down from +4.5 to +3.5. The parlay cards were frozen at +4.5 so many guys used Cincinnati. Otherwise, the books were avalanched on Packers money after the news on Ponder, and the trend all week was Ravens money. Seattle took some action from -2.5 to -3.

Lots of parlays cashing tonight. The sportsbooks got hit with considerable Notre Dame money line action, which is typical of a name brand popular team in a championship game, but Alabama bettors gave the points. The sportsbooks needed Alabama to win but not cover. Once that didn't happen, they were forced to pay off the all-chalk tickets.

Here's a link indicating how bad it got late this season for sportsbooks, including the MGM forced to dip into emergency cash to pay off all the winning tickets:

http://www.businessinsider.com/las-vegas-sportsbooks-lose-money-on-nfl-2013-1
 
i tried to tell people that from the jump this season...but this board is too short sighted...you can't run your qb to contact as much as shanny has this year...good thing he's a 23 year old or so...if he was 30 he'd be dead...

fellas the only thing washington did this year was take 5 years off rg3's shelf life..once those legs go in that o it's a wrap...barring them going with a totally different pro set o which griffen can't play in cause he can't read the field well enough this things history...within 5 years he's done..he's on a faster fall off track than mike vick had...

he better milk the **** out of it now...kills me that shannys this damn stupid

Wait until he starts getting cracked ribs and stuff and has to wear the flak jacket.
 
Here's a link indicating how bad it got late this season for sportsbooks, including the MGM forced to dip into emergency cash to pay off all the winning tickets:

http://www.businessinsider.com/las-vegas-sportsbooks-lose-money-on-nfl-2013-1

Here's a quote from within that link:

"Kornegay also said that the books got killed on preseason over/under prop bets."

***

I noticed that last week, after looking at the opening lines and where they moved. Virtually every move was correct, and in several cases the number fell exactly wrong for the sportsbooks, like the Dolphins winning 7 when you could have played either under 7.5 or over 6.5, depending when you shopped. I had Cleveland under 6 but you could also have played over 4.5. In fact, one of my colleagues hedged some of his wager with 1/3 the amount on over 4.5, so he won both ways when it fell 5.

The sportsbooks no doubt be more conservative beginning next season, putting those numbers out later and not as prone to move the digits. Instead of moves from 7.5 to 6.5 they'll be more prone to stay at 7 and increase the juice on the under. Anything to avoid the dreaded middle. The NFL may be a copycat league but Las Vegas is a scared city, even if they are desperate to pretend otherwise and avoid that reputation. Win more than they prefer and they either chase you out or change the rules. When the Rams won the Super Bowl at 150/1 initial odds in 1999 that caused the industry to slash prices on longshots. Now even inept teams might open at 50/1 or 75/1. I have to laugh when I see those odds quoted. The Canes are a whopping 25/1 to win the BCS title game next season, according to Bovada. Anyone who takes that price, I'd like to book their action for the rest of my life.

***

Regarding Robert Griffin, he's always been horrendous at sensing pressure and avoiding contact. Shocking lack of instincts along those lines, given the speed and athletic ability. I can't stand the guy and it started early. As a freshman at Baylor all he had to do was sidestep a clod defender and make a simple pass to a wide open receiver for me to win a bet, a healthy bet. Instead, Griffin stood there and allowed the plodding mediocrity to hammer him. I couldn't believe what I was looking at. After his early knee trouble at Baylor, Griffin compensated by running sideways out of the pocket as soon as he sensed anything. Sometimes he sensed trouble that wasn't there. He'd literally turn his back to the line of scrimmage and dart sideways and a little bit backwards, setting up shop in a clear area. Initially he'd make nothing of those manipulated circumstances but during his final season it actually clicked, and smack from the opener, frustrating TCU. Long late improvised completions. I thought he'd regress to the mean as the season unfolded but it didn't happen. There's no denying Griffin's results the past two seasons has been beyond my expectation or wishes. He's had offenses nicely tailored for him, notably this season. We'll see where it goes.

I still handicap him as a phony, and plenty of familiar themes have surfaced along those lines. He goes out of his way to describe himself as a man. Not once, many times. He tweeted something about warriors and not many people being actually in the field of battle. It was deflection toward criticism. Inane defensive self-absorbed nonsense, the type of thing Lebron James would be crucified for. He felt threatened by the praise toward Kirk Cousins to the point he described himself as the "best option for the team" and "that's why I'm the starter." This was immediately following a playoff defeat, at home after a 14-0 lead. I'll go so far as to say Robert Griffin was quite pleased that Cousins flopped late in that playoff game, that he in fact silently rooted that way from the sidelines. Otherwise Cousins moves tighter in reputation, with whispers toward next season, given Griffin's health. Robert Griffin and his super hero socks can't have that type of thing.
 
Back
Top Bottom