Of course is respectable. I've always like to read what you post about any player or coach. I can say this tho. My reason is not really about money per se. I just don't want the offense to have him as our number 1 target, specially when we just targeted him 160 times. It gets you nowhere imo. We have 4 years of doing that and it has gotten us ONE playoff game in which we got destroyed. That's really my problem there. If they give him that type of money then it means they want to continue to target him way more than anyone else and that will give us the same result we've gotten the last 4 years.Who knows what Miami will do. You can never tell with this organization.
But where we disagree is the value of Jarvis Landry to this team. I think 14 million AAV is not a deal breaker. Sure I would like him at 12, but I also understand allowing JL to reach free agent status this was the risk and for people to think it is some outlandish sum, I think you'll see several teams step up to pay it if Miami decides not to franchise tag him or reach a deal with him prior to free agency.
I also think if you have that type of production for 4 years on a 2nd round rookie contract . . . a team should feel "better" about giving him a big number for his second contract. You think it means I condone all players doing that . . . no. Jarvis has given you the goods for 4 seasons . . . to squabble over a 1 million or 2 seems trivial IMO when we are in a league where guys sign 5 year deals and in year 2 they want new deals. Juice came to work every day, did not hold out, was durable and productive and I think when you factor in a rising cap and the WR market in general . . . . 14 million is not a "greedy" number. It is market value.
But it is ok to disagree. Even if it gets heated, its respectable still.
Ozzy rules!!