I stand corrected...
"
Q: Other than Ryan Tannehill, Jonathan Martin and Caleb Sturgis every other rookie under Joe Philbin has had to earn there playing time the past two years. I have heard of sitting a rookie QB for a season and let him learn the ropes, but it seems like Philbin does this with all rookies. His original plan was to sit Tannehill his rookie year. Do you think this mentality hurts the team in the long run or helps it? Is this a company policy to sit rookies? James, Moody, AFB
A: Miami's orginal plan was to sit Tannehill as a rookie because he couldn't beat out David Garrard. But he eventually beat out Matt Moore and played. Tannehill earned it. Playing time under Philbin has been earned, and every rookie the past two years has had his opportunity to get on the field. The problem is, most of them can't beat out their competition. Dion Jordan didn't play more because the former Oregon linebacker couldn't set the edge properly. So his snaps went to Derrick Shelby, who has a pretty decent second season. Dallas Thomas got the first crack at replacing John Jerry as the team's starting right guard and he struggled tremendously in camp. He was the first backup to Martin at left tackle and struggled there too. That's why he didn't play. Jamar Taylor's training camp was short-circuited by his groin issue, but Will Davis had a decent camp, pulling down more than half a dozen interceptions in practice. Problem is Davis was inconsistent, struggled in the exhibition season, and didn't prove he was better than Nolan Carroll and Jimmy Wilson in practices. If he had practiced better than Carroll and Wilson there's no doubt Davis would have been playing. Same applies to linebacker Jelani Jenkins. He was bad in training camp, but as he got better he started to earn playing time. I'm fine with rookies EARNING their time because I get to watch practice and I can see how they perform, and what their issues are. None of last year's rookies - outside of Sturgis of course - earned significant playing time. However, that doesn't mean they won't develop into second year contributors like Olivier Vernon and Lamar Miller did in 2013. Sometimes it takes time and patience for a rookie to blossom."
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/miami-dolphins/sfl-askomar,0,6671297.story
But, Philbin signed off on the drafting of injured Jordan...
"Earlier in the week, during an organization dinner, Ross had polled all the Dolphins' coaches, asking them who, with no regard to position or draft pick, each coach would want on the team. The name that kept coming up was Jordan. When Ireland told Ross he was going to call Oakland five minutes into the 10 minute draft clock for the Raiders' selection, Ross thought it was a joke."
http://www.thephinsider.com/2013/4/26/4271556/dolphins-draft-picks-dion-jordan-ireland-ross-reflect-on-trade-to-get
More disturbing about our draft is the final snap count, 866:
http://blogs.palmbeachpost.com/thedailydolphin/2013/12/31/rookie-fail-no-draft-class-had-less-snaps-in-2013-than-the-miami-dolphins/
View attachment 12258
compared to the rest of the league:
View attachment 12259
But that is not true of the 2012 class, 3603 snaps:
http://bloggingthebeast.com/2013/01/01/2012-nfl-final-rookie-snap-counts/
But not every finger can be pointed at Ireland. Jordan was drafted to replace an under-impressive Vernon. Jordan couldn't do it when healthy, which either speaks to Philbin's inability to grade Jordan pre-draft or develop/asses Vernon after 1 year.
The coaches signed off on the draft picks with Ireland. I agree Philbin has not had much to work with after seeing their progress over each year, but he did sign off on the drafting of these players. So, maybe the more important statement here is Philbin cannot identify or assess his development of talent under his own nose.
I'm starting to question what he does well.