Feverdream
Club Member
I think it is very possible that Parsons is there. Not a lock, but certainly a possibility.I can't see Houston doing better than 6-10 so that pick will be outside the Top 5 but still very high.
7 or 8 seems about right.
If that is the case i think they will miss out on Sewell or Parsons for sure and best play would probably be a trade down.
I am having trouble being happy with the Fins using the #7 pick as I don't think the value will be there.The best players on the board will likely be at positions that don't fit the Fins needs and the I don't want them to reach for a WR that high.
Bets case is a trade down 5 spots or so and then you grab the WR everyone seems to want.
I'm adding it up like this... last year, the 2nd and 3rd QBs slid because the teams at 2-4 didn't need QBs, and we had a stranglehold on trading up because we were in a position where we could outbid anyone who was willing to make a deal. The other teams were wary because we could bid them up and then drop it on them... so everyone backed off. It was liar's poker... and we won.
This year, the teams at 2-5 all look like they need QBs and even though we control the board again, we've got our guy...and are more apt to trade down than up. The Jets and Jags will both take QBs, the Giants and Noskins might. Hell, the Cowgurls might. The Patriots certainly need to take one... I foresee a serious rush on the position and that will drop EVERYTHING else down.
Now... in general, we all agree that the premium positions in the NFL are passer, pass rusher, push defender, and pass blocker... and those positions will generally go next, even in years where the touts believe the players to be weaker than most years. Sewell, Surtain, Rousseau, Paye... Leatherwood, Cosmi, Basham, even Barmore might jump ahead of Parsons. Hell... Ja'Marr Chase might.
So will Parsons slide a bit... especially after opting out?
I'm willing to call the bet and see what happens... just like we did with Tua.
Last edited: