Of course you would.
I guess you are prepared to turn yourself blue in the face.
One story..run with it.
So if I found a SI article advocating that ZO be in the HOF...what would that say about your "source"?
It's funny though how I can show you an article about his choking ways but you can't find an article about how clutch he was.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2003/basketball/nba/12/05/h2h.zo/#react
a head2head debate from 2003.
Before his comeback. before his great play backing up SHAQ. before his championship and before his considerations for 6th man and defensive player of the year awards. (off the bench no less)
What a persuasive argument. B/c 3 guys we've never heard of are in then Zo must make it. I'm convinced
McCallum is pretty accurate w/ his argument.
He has been a bit player since that article, he rode the coattails of Wade and Shaq to a Championship. He had his worst of 3 seasons in their Championship run, they would have won it w/ or w/o him.
Those clips are a joke, friends of Zo going to bat for him. Magic was a great player, he's a terrible commentator and Barkley is only there for laughs. That is why they don't let former players vote for the Hall, b/c they'd vote their friends in. The facts show us he was not a great player.
26-26 1 block 1 dunk
47-46 dunk
64-57 blocks dampier as he slides over to help which was actually goaltending but not called.
64-57 blocks jason terry which should have been a foul call.
I can't watch anymore, I can't watch a video stertch out 8 points and 5 clocks where 2 of them that I saw should have been waived off.
I don't know what that proves? that he played a few good minutes off the bench? He still wasn't vital to your run and you would have won w/ or w/o him. It's been proven he can't lead a team to a title.