You do realize Baltimore would let him go b/c he isn't doing **** for them right now...
Knowledge? What exactly are you disagreeing with anyway? If you disagree with someone, the burden of proof lies with you buddy.
I disagree with OT's not being able to play at a high level at 31 and even 34. I disagree with CB's having a longer shelf life than OT's. The burden of proof is with the one who made the statement to back it up, and you have done nothing whatsoever to do so other than typing your opinion.
Successful organization letting go of an OT that has been playing bad means that we should pick him up? Makes sense.
You'd make a terrible lawyer. Burden of proof always lies with the one who disagrees. Law 101 right there. Anyways, if posters had to back up every statement with a citation from a website, this place would be a ****hole. You are the one going on about Brent Grimes...I never brought him up. I was talking about OTs and how their skills can diminish quickly. Using Grimes as a measuring stick is just not a fair comparison.
Over the years, I have seen many an NFL player ripped for many a different reason. A bus full of strippers is a first. Has the "moral majority" taken seed with Football Fans? :)
Z, This is going nowhere and for me is over. In law or debate, one party makes an accusation or statement. Then, the second party disputes it, and the first party has time to dispute or rebut what the second party has stated. The burden of proof is on the opening accusation and/or statement.
Denny Crane :)
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...ns-expected-to-explore-bryant-mckinnie-trade/ we should look into this.
Over the years, I have seen many an NFL player ripped for many a different reason. A bus full of strippers is a first. Has the "moral majority" taken seed with Football Fans? :)