I'm going to assume you wrote something. Based on what Travis34 said, you clearly tried to respond, but either you thought better of what you wrote or the moderators saw fit to delete it for being a personal attack or something. Regardless, we disagree on this video and our assessment of Tannehill.
IF you are going to do any sort of analytics on a QB, it is beyond comprehension that you fail to stress the change in coaching staff and offensive scheme. Tannehill has had 4 sets of coaches in 4 years, with very little continuity. But, it is the current coaching staff that merits the most close scrutiny. With any transition you will see an initial learning period, followed by more stable data once the team has adjusted to the new offense. The Author ignores this. He lumps ALL of Tannehill's 2016 stats into one undivided bucket. Anybody knows that is a poor analysis. The more prudent thing to do, and the way any NFL analyst (and I mean analyst, not reporter or blogger) would do it is to look at the break points.
With Tannehill, we see a break point after 5 games. He threw very few INT's after that point, and his metrics, even by the Author's standards, were stellar. The next break point, obviously, would be the injury which ended his season. But yeah ... why note that, because it would show clearly that once the Dolphins had gotten a handle on the offense that the QB position was performing at a very very high level. If Tannehill plays the 2017 season at a pace similar to how he played the 2016 season after the first 5 games ... we are looking at a lock to make the Pro Bowl. I'm expecting him to be close to that good. It will be interesting to revisit this Author's thoughts at that point.