Alex44
Chicago Bears GM
ajajaj said:1. Of course they didn't administer the drug test, could you maybe argue with information my two year old couldn't figure out please. The point is this should have gone under the radar like many in the past have for many other players. Instead this is now in the limelight and the NFL may be forced by public opinion to take a more stern action than they would have had this been taken care of behind closed doors, how it should have been. Theirfore inhibiting Ricky's carreer and our power and ability to trade him to others.
2. A reporter doesn't have to reveal his sources therefore letting Denver get by without getting caught.
No, the story was not "made up by the broncos", but it was made public by a reporter having ties to the bronco's very shortly after they (the broncos) began investigating Ricky's past. That is amazingly convinient don't ya think???
Except for the fact that the reporter said he was was talking with either a league official or a Bronco's staff member and got the info, either way it makes your theory impossible, if a league official told then there is no foul play, if he got it from a broncos staff member the denver has already been caught
and
There is no way the Broncos would intentionally leak the story because it helps them in no way at all
Ricky failed a drug test everyone get over it please, It could be a misunderstanding, but denver has no part in this