Yes.
1. I think it is clear that there is accountability. Not only has Gase on multiple occasions called himself out for poor performances, but players as well. Look at what is happening this off-season, the coach has removed people who were not doing the job they were assigned up to the standard he expects. In the last couple of weeks, he has replaced the OC, RB, OL, WR, DL, and head trainer. I would not be surprised that part of the issues with these coaches was not just lack of development, but also the issue with the preparedness of the players. PArt of that does fall on Gase, but a head coach expects his staff to be able to carry that out to the players.
2. This past season is a wash, on top of losing a starting QB who is a presence on the field adds a level of leadership. I also think that the frustration knowing that due to the QB's ability they could only have so much success. While the decision to bring in Cutler was a poor one as Cutler didn't have the ability to make the throws, he did know the offense and I think that is what Gase wanted.
3. Most of the vets on this team, the ones that would be a driving force are from the Philbin era where he feared Alpha personalities. I think that gets corrected over time as more "Gase" players are brought in. When your most notable vets are Suh and Wake...neither of which is known for being a vocal leader, there is an issue. I think some of that gets fixed pretty easily with the addition of Tannehill back on the field and potentially McMillian (who was a known leader at OSU).
4. The biggest difference I see is that Gase seems to have the ability to think and plan with some of the best coaches in the league. While his arrogance will get him into trouble, I rather have that then captain queazy. QB play this year really held the team back that, and lack of talent and smart players in key areas.
