And just to follow that up, being a box score follower can be nice, but it's not going to tell you what actually happened. If the box score was genuinely meaningful for analyzing the game of football beyond the purely abstract, then fixing things would be as simple as saying "Gee, we should just stop throwing the ball unless we're pretty sure we can score a touchdown on the play."
That is of course, ridiculous.
Everything in context. For instance, our team is bad at converting third downs? Is it because we suck at throwing on third downs, or because our average gain needed to convert is much higher than average? Maybe you saw during yesterday's game that at one point, Miami was averaging 11.9 yards needed on third down. 11.9 yards! We had so many penalties in that game that when our offense didn't pick up chunks to move the sticks, we were actually moving backwards on 1st and 2nd down.
I wonder what ESPN's QBR would say about that.
That is of course, ridiculous.
Everything in context. For instance, our team is bad at converting third downs? Is it because we suck at throwing on third downs, or because our average gain needed to convert is much higher than average? Maybe you saw during yesterday's game that at one point, Miami was averaging 11.9 yards needed on third down. 11.9 yards! We had so many penalties in that game that when our offense didn't pick up chunks to move the sticks, we were actually moving backwards on 1st and 2nd down.
I wonder what ESPN's QBR would say about that.