LOL...you just need to roll with the intent of his postExcept lyrically this isn’t a happy song at all lol
LOL...you just need to roll with the intent of his postExcept lyrically this isn’t a happy song at all lol
Terron Armstead was taken in the 3rd round........So he was like 13th OT taken why?
Because it was a deep class and he was the 8th OT taken. ThreeOTs went after him that a lot of people had as second round picks too. Amegadji, Rosengarten and Suamatia all have potential as well.
6 OTs went ahead of Terron Armstead too including the No.1 and No.2 picks, who TA ended up being a lot better than. Only Lane Johnson can say he was in TAs league.
Production, size and agility like Paul has is all you can ask for in the 55th pick.
But what's it for olinemen in "early" rounds? 50% sounds pretty solid for the first 3 rounds for olineman and that's where Grier's at, but I keep reading how terrible he is at drafting olinemen.I believe that it is the typical NFL "success to failure" ratio for 1st rounder draft picks.
I think it just comes down to a difference in draft philosophies. Those that are unhappy with the pick generally fall into the camp that wants a day one contributor. You'll never talk these folks into agreeing that this is a good pick b/c Paul most likely isn't contributing this year let alone day one.Right, Paul, Rosengarten, and the BYU tackle had some buzz about sneaking into the late 1st, and that's often where you have to take OT's with any chance of succeeding. Because there were so many good OT's, and because of the talent at other positions (WR, QB - CB and DT after the Top 20), Paul was available a full 30 picks after the range you usually have to gamble on these kinds of talents. I didn't see a huge difference between Guyton and Paul.
Paul is more physically talented than Isaiah Wilson, for example, but he's also a high-character guy. He's a lot more talented than Kaleb McGreary (sp?).
The draft is the place to make your best bets. A high-character OT with elite physical traits is a great bet at 55. I love that he's already working with Duke Manyweather and OL Masterminds, love that he wants to be in Miami and work with Coach Berry, and I love that he's already attacking his weaknesses.
Miami needed some difference-making talent on the OL. It's unsurprising that the NFL snatched up the Day 1 Starter OT's Top 20. But, Miami was still able to take advantage of the strength of the class. That's a big win in my book.
I viewed Paul as a good pick in that range for anyone (without the bump OT's typically get), but he seems like a particularly great fit for Miami.
I think it just comes down to a difference in draft philosophies. Those that are unhappy with the pick generally fall into the camp that wants a day one contributor. You'll never talk these folks into agreeing that this is a good pick b/c Paul most likely isn't contributing this year let alone day one.
Right, Paul, Rosengarten, and the BYU tackle had some buzz about sneaking into the late 1st, and that's often where you have to take OT's with any chance of succeeding. Because there were so many good OT's, and because of the talent at other positions (WR, QB - CB and DT after the Top 20), Paul was available a full 30 picks after the range you usually have to gamble on these kinds of talents. I didn't see a huge difference between Guyton and Paul.
Paul is more physically talented than Isaiah Wilson, for example, but he's also a high-character guy. He's a lot more talented than Kaleb McGreary (sp?).
The draft is the place to make your best bets. A high-character OT with elite physical traits is a great bet at 55. I love that he's already working with Duke Manyweather and OL Masterminds, love that he wants to be in Miami and work with Coach Berry, and I love that he's already attacking his weaknesses.
Miami needed some difference-making talent on the OL. It's unsurprising that the NFL snatched up the Day 1 Starter OT's Top 20. But, Miami was still able to take advantage of the strength of the class. That's a big win in my book.
I viewed Paul as a good pick in that range for anyone (without the bump OT's typically get), but he seems like a particularly great fit for Miami.
I think it just comes down to a difference in draft philosophies. Those that are unhappy with the pick generally fall into the camp that wants a day one contributor. You'll never talk these folks into agreeing that this is a good pick b/c Paul most likely isn't contributing this year let alone day one.
As I said a few days back, this is a great draft to need an OL. There's still solid starter-level talent on the board.
I was just joking based on all the consternation from some of our posters.And for all we know someone else took their player, and so on and so on. Our team is focusing on the guys we added, we should too.
We added two talented potential difference makers at premier positions.
Don’t let logic get in the way of any future tantrammingBecause it was a deep class and he was the 8th OT taken. ThreeOTs went after him that a lot of people had as second round picks too. Amegadji, Rosengarten and Suamatia all have potential as well.
6 OTs went ahead of Terron Armstead too including the No.1 and No.2 picks, who TA ended up being a lot better than. Only Lane Johnson can say he was in TAs league.
Production, size and agility like Paul has is all you can ask for in the 55th pick.
I’d bet most people would take that combine measurement as the most accurateI’m debating the height difference between Hunt and Paul. Which is 1or2 inches which doesn’t make any difference. I gave you two websites that show Hunt is 6’6. You keep responding saying Hunt is 6’5.2. What is your point? What does that matter?
You've met our current OLT? seems to miss quite a bit of time yearly.Beebe will be a day one starter at guard for whomever drafts him. T-Rex arms won’t matter. Paul will only see action on the field goal package.