so-long-Ricky
Seasoned Veteran
rickeyrunsover said:LOL, your ignorance is clearly evident. ANDY REID is teh one who SAID it in 2003. Yes in teh intial game Detmer would have replaced DM. That was NEVER the argument. The argument is if DM went out for an extended period, AJ would start the following games. They had Detmer active so he could hold for Akers because he was Akers pick. They have enough confidence in Detmer that he could play the game DM was hurt and then they can keep a qb inactive/emergency, thus freeing an active roster spot for another position. Yes there is a huge debate whether Reid was just saying that or whether it was true, but the fact is that is what was stated. There is no way to prove or disprove that since DM never went out for an extended period. But that was NOT an issue made up on this board.
rickeyrunsover said:Nope it is easier to just stay blind and not have to admit you may have been wrong. Judging based on your comments, you have teh "I am right and I have to be right for my ego" syndrome and wouldnt want to actually read for yourself.
The article was well over 2 years ago, and your implications are that we owe it to you to find it for you, knowing we wont, it allows you to keep your opinion. That is fine, you cling to it. Doesnt make your opinion fact.
Wow....you jumped right in there to defend your buddy.
Look below
enigmatics said:AJ started because Detmer got hurt.
abNORMal said:That is what I thought happened, I was not confident enuff to say for sure..![]()
Any questions?
I'm done w/this topic.