I find it kind of funny how here we have a guy in alex smith who was the 1st overall pick in 2005, has basically stunk his entire career, and last year he has his best season, which was more of playing the role of caretaker than playmaker, and people try and defend him. if he had been drafted by the dolphins 1st overall and this was how he performed throughout his career, people would be crucifying him.
smith is a medicore at best qb, who if u surround with enough talent, like a stout defense like the 49ers had, he can be the qb of a team and go pretty far( still couldnt make the plays to get them past the giants despite the 49ers defense having the game of their life).
also, its funny how people on here cant stop bashing moore, who is by no means great, but has been just as medicore as smith if not better, and had no expectations.
if we brought smith in, fine, but just like flynn, he should not be given the job without competition. we arent talking like the difference between tom brady and curtis painter here exactly. both these qbs, smith, flynn, and moore, are all very similar.
as for the people who bring up his 7 different ocs in 7 years, well i didnt know that, but even so its got to make you think.
it cant be that all those 7 ocs were horrible, but since their coaches take the blame most of the time whether its their fault or not, those guys were the fall guys. im sorry, i just cant buy that 7 ocs came into san fran and they were all so bad, thats not a coincidence, someone else ( cough cough alex smith) had to be a big part of the reason also as to why that offense looked like ****.