darefugee
Club Member
Just curious.
Philly has an interesting problem now don't they?
Philly has an interesting problem now don't they?
Anyone here think Foles is better than Tannehill?
- Thread starter darefugee
- Start date
Foles was outstanding in every way. The guy made great throws all night. I love the way Pederson kept attacking until his D could get a turnover.
DKphin
Active Roster
I do not think he is worse, but get ready for the T-hill lovers to invade this thread.
DisturbedShifty
Peace out
darefugee
Club Member
Someone was gonna do it Bro. I figured let’s just get it out of the way.
What's their problem? Foles will either stay as their back up until his contract runs out next season or be traded. Either way he's going to make a crapload of money
Foles is 10X better than Tannehill. I think the question you are asking is if we should go trade for him? Well, Foles flourished in aggressive offenses under Kelly and Pederson. Is Gase aggressive? No? So Tannehill is the perfect qb for the Phins. The coach and qb always reflect the team.
dolphinheel
Active Roster
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2004
- Messages
- 6,206
- Reaction score
- 8,997
Before the injury I would have given the nod to Tannehill because of his speed. I’ll reserve judgment until I see how the knee heels. If they are both pocket passers I’m taking Foles all day. But I do agree that OL play like Philly has makes life so easy on a QB.
miamiron
Active Roster
kingfin23
This is the Year
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2006
- Messages
- 4,082
- Reaction score
- 2,442
- Age
- 52
Yes, They was pretty much just sitting back all game. Tannehill usually running around trying to make a play. Foles is better with a good O line, but not better with mediocre o line. We still rebuilding o line since 2005. Hopefully we get it done by year 2023.
Don't worry it was inevitable. I was really expecting a 'who has better sideline emotion Wentz or Tannehill?' thread or something along those lines.