Are Dolphins actually better than their 3-4 record? We'll get better idea vs. Jets | Page 5 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Are Dolphins actually better than their 3-4 record? We'll get better idea vs. Jets

Never let a chance to bash him go by do you?

Would we be a 3-4 team with Carr as qb?

Would the raiders be where they are with Tannehill as qb?

We all know the answer, let's all stop pretending the QB position doesn't have a huge effect on team record.
 
Would we be a 3-4 team with Carr as qb?

Would the raiders be where they are with Tannehill as qb?

We all know the answer, let's all stop pretending the QB position doesn't have a huge effect on team record.

Impossible to know since Carr is Oakland's QB but don't let that stop you from assuming **** that can't be proven.

Oakland has looked good this year. Their problem is they haven't beaten anyone. Saints, Titans, Ravens, Chargers, Jaguars, and Bucs. None of them are better than .500. The two teams Oakland has played that are better than .500 (Falcons and Chiefs), Raiders lost both. They play Denver twice in the last eight games. They play KC again. They play Denver, Houston, Carolina, and Buffalo in what will be an upcoming 4 game homestand with a bye mixed in (Dolphins are at the end of theirs).

Keep in mind Carr is also 16-24 still as a starter. This despite throwing 70 TDs and 28 INTs over that stretch. That shows immediately that it's a team game and one person can't do it alone.
 
Would we be a 3-4 team with Carr as qb?

Would the raiders be where they are with Tannehill as qb?

We all know the answer, let's all stop pretending the QB position doesn't have a huge effect on team record.

Let it go. We know how you feel
 
Back
Top Bottom