LithoMan
☠️ Banned ☠️
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2004
- Messages
- 1,065
- Reaction score
- 0
Thats the pot calling the kettle black. Your POV entertains me. So, even though Blackstock, from your own clip you pulled, is a strong second round candidate, you deem Roth a better, and he was selected were? Not to mention, you cant even claim he was a first rounder, not with the likes of David Pollack in the draft. So, you deem my point of view wrong, just because you think "your guy" fits us better. And, Darryl could of been used in a position we have nobvody suited for, but you aren't even sure if Roth can play LDE, so in that case, we drafted a replacement, right? And that would eb a 4th round or lower pick, right? So, were is my logic wrong?
You answered your own questions/comments, but were to ignorant to even notice that you argued my case for me. Thanks!
You answered your own questions/comments, but were to ignorant to even notice that you argued my case for me. Thanks!