bakedmatt
I drink your milkshake!
maybe next week he'll catch a pass over 10 yards.
tucker said:good for him, but boston has never been known to have great hands, and you are looking at boston from his past, he just isnt where he needs to be as of yet..i'd love to see boston in his tip top shape, but he's not there right now
Noodleman said:First, Boston is making plays partly due to the fact that Chambers is on the field. The reality is that Chambers is the fins best receiver right now. Second, the reality is that three weeks ago Boston was on the bubble for making the team. Third, if you look at history in Chambers career, when has he EVER had a qb that could consistently get him the ball? When has he EVER been in offense that was not conservative? I find it amazing that Chambers has even suceeded at all. Finally, if you compare their careers boston and Chambers have pretty comparable stats. If you look at Boston since he left Arizona, what has he done? Chambers is a game changer.......if the fins get decent qb play, Chambers, not Boston, will be the one to have the huge year. Just a side question, how can you possibly know that Chambers doesn't run good routes? I have been a Fin fan for 25 years and since Chambers has been in the league I have never once read anywhere or seen anything that would give me that idea.
texasPHINSfan said:its moronic because he is basing his opinion on faulty information.
If i think that Ricky was the best RB in 2004, and i proclaim it as such as my opinion, its a stupid opinion because he did not play last year.
To say that Chambers hasn't proven anything in his career and Boston has is also assinine, as their stats will attest to. I posted them pretty clear. Obviously the person who posted that comment only saw Boston's one stellar year and never looked at Chamber's stats. If you are going to criticize my post and attempt to condescend, at least respond to my points instead of taking it off-course.
texasPHINSfan said:you pick two stats that Boston trumps Chambers on. I can pick two stats that Chambers trumps Boston on. what does that prove?
Chambers has produced his ENTIRE career. Boston hasn't produced the "earth-shattering" stats that you love so much since 2001. He is four years removed from that year, when he was younger and probably in better shape (and pre-surgery). Boston is 4 years older from that time, and no longer the #1 WR, and a surgery or two under his belt, not to mention on a team with crappy QBs and a dearth of good WRs. What makes you think he'll repeat? thats what i want to know.
bakedmatt said:maybe next week he'll catch a pass over 10 yards.
death7star said:bad throw, he would have been out of bounds on that throw even if he caught it.
texasPHINSfan said:Boston career yards: 4619 (5 years) 25 TDs average yds yr: 923
Chambers career yards: 3478 (4 years) 28 TDs average yds yr: 870
BOTH guys are averaging 14.9 yards a catch over their career.
Boston had a QB that threw 525 times for 3600 yards in his best year.
Chambers had a QB that threw 318 times for 2100 yards in his best year.
Saban4prez said:I'm happy with what we're getting out of boston as well. but im a booker man myself, and boston's still got a ways to go.