So lets just assume that the defense was one LB away from being Top 10 AND the oline was one Player away from being Top 10..... you have one pick. A Franchise LB type, (Ray Lewis, Von Miller etc...) is there and a Franchise LT (Ogden etc...) is there......... who do you take?
Five years down the road I doubt any of those teams that picked in front of us will regret passing on Tunsil, even if they all picked busts.
Five years down the road I doubt any of those teams that picked in front of us will regret passing on Tunsil, even if they all picked busts.
What do you guys think of this argument for choosing Darron Lee with the 13th pick over Tunsil? Basically what he's saying is that more teams make the playoffs that have top 10 defenses as opposed to teams that have top 10 offenses, therefore he would have picked a defensive player with the 13th pick.
So the discussion is, would you rather have a top 10 offensive line or a top 10 defense?
My rebuttal to him would be, selecting Darron Lee would not have made our defense a top 10 defense, this year or ever.
Whereas selecting Tunsil could POSSIBLEY give us a top 10 offensive line from day one.
What do you guys think?
Forgot to post the link.
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/...-instead-of-laremy-tunsil-20160512-story.html
More teams make the playoffs whose QBs aren't pissing blood, than teams whose teams are pissing blood.
Five years down the road I doubt any of those teams that picked in front of us will regret passing on Tunsil, even if they all picked busts.
vCash bet?
---------- Post added at 09:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:22 PM ----------
10k bet. In 5 years, take a look back, and if any reasonable human can say that NO team, drafting 1-12, would prefer Tunsil to what they got from this draft, you win. Otherwise, I win.
Because, honestly, I think you're blowing smoke out of your ass on this one.