flynryan15
Club Member
Give Dansby the Vontea treatment! What's the worse that can happen we cover a TE??
I understand. It's an aspect of communicating his stance that he needs to improve on. Be firm, direct, specific, and most of all clear where you stand. I think he's trying to leave a little bit for the players to figure out themselves. Don't do that.
Coaching in the NFL is more about managing personalities than anything else. Most of these guys aren't looking for a mentor, and if they haven't matured by the time they're 25, they're not going to be mature at 35 either.
The question is, to whom?
Joe Philbin told the PRESS that he prefers to keep that discussion in-house. Did he tell Karlos Dansby that? According to Karlos Dansby, no he did not. They never even brushed on that topic.
I'm not out to get Joe Philbin but if he's making himself clear to the press but avoiding the confrontational admonishments to his players, that could be a problem. I didn't like his words to Chad Johnson. If I was Chad Johnson I honestly come away from that conversation not understanding if Joe Philbin expects me to do or say anything differently, because by the end of the conversation it seemed like Philbin was saying if you and I differ on our preference for swearing and the like, that's fine.
I felt he was similarly vague when Chad crashed the coaches meeting and it took Philbin a good couple of minutes before it started to become apparent that he didn't intend to let Johnson sit in on the meeting.
CK - I'm an avid reader/fan of your posts... always scanning threads for your .02 on the matter. Buuuuuut... not on this one. It's called TACT: noun 1. a keen sense of what to say or do to avoid giving offense; skill in dealing with difficult or delicate situations.
Philbin is/was trying to be tactful in his approach while still letting Chad know who was in charge. He's not Parcells... and his not Cameron. He's somewhere in between... and I welcome that balance. It's that balance Coughlin found with the Giants that he lacked while in Jacksonville. And I, personally, think it works.
Moreover, I agree with everyone that is pointing out that this isn't just "a business"... the NFL is BIG BUSINESS... none of what's had to be addressed with Chad has been anything that a 10+ year vet should have to have pointed out to him.
I, for one, don't want to see an authoritarian like Parcells leading this team... nor do I want to see a wet towel like Cameron sinking the ship either. Let's try cutting Philbin a little slack here and consider the possibility that he was trying to employ TACT with Chad Johnson despite knowing in the back of his mind that this was completely ridiculous conduct for any player, let alone a 10+ year vet.
In my opinion... this has been addition through subtraction. Let the younger (hungrier) receivers compete and learn as they go (with more reps now - thanks Chad!). Let's see what we have to work with and so we'll know better what to look for via trade, draft, waiver, whatever. And let's send a MESSAGE while we're at it. You want to play the fool... you go do it with some other team. I can't anything but APPLAUD Philbin.
My .02, for what it's worth.
Chad has to push things, and he did, and it took Philbin quite a bit of time before he could start to make it clear that Chad needed to not be in there. I don't think that's tact, I think that's being disarmed by a situation you weren't prepared for...sort of the reason why Jeff Ireland and Brian Daboll once upon a time cooked up that weird charade where they had Daboll bust into their meeting with Andy Dalton as if he were a diva wide receiver to see how Dalton handled it.
In Philbin's defense:
1. He's never been a Head Coach before at any level of football, so a learning curve should be expected
2. His General Manager gifted this rookie Head Coach with one of the most challenging players in the NFL to deal with
I believe you can be tactful while still making it clear to your players what you expect of them. If Joe Philbin makes it clear to the media that he doesn't approve of Karlos Dansby's radio rant, but he doesn't make that clear to Dansby himself, that's not tact...that's just wrong. Joe Philbin's little discussion with Chad Johnson wherein an educated person could hardly tell whether Johnson should come out of that conversation knowing whether or not he's supposed to change his behavior, that's not tact...to me that's just lack of clarity. I even thought his handling of Chad Johnson's busting in on the coaches meeting was another instance of not being able to make his intentions clear to the player. He was trying to play along and I think he expected Chad to give up on the joke within seconds, but that's not Chad. Chad has to push things, and he did, and it took Philbin quite a bit of time before he could start to make it clear that Chad needed to not be in there. I don't think that's tact, I think that's being disarmed by a situation you weren't prepared for...sort of the reason why Jeff Ireland and Brian Daboll once upon a time cooked up that weird charade where they had Daboll bust into their meeting with Andy Dalton as if he were a diva wide receiver to see how Dalton handled it.
In Philbin's defense:
1. He's never been a Head Coach before at any level of football, so a learning curve should be expected
2. His General Manager gifted this rookie Head Coach with one of the most challenging players in the NFL to deal with
Good points, CK. I will say this, though... further in Philbin's defense. Given time to reflect and then act, I suspect that Philbin's cerebral nature will show that his learning curves are going to be steep and short... and this incident, I believe, illustrates that.
being tactful is no saving grace for a severe lack of eloquence and vigor in your speech. it still comes off as weak, ineffectual.
it appears there are no other leaders on the team besides dansby, since reportedly, no one explained to him that he misappropriated his support (publicly!) at the detriment of the entire organization, up & down, from image to morale. even worse, the coach admonishing his actions to the press while (if) privately ignoring it is plain wishy-washy. i've yet to see any evidence we've upgraded from sparano aside from the up-tempo practice style.
to top it off the f.o. makes two bad personnel decisions at the very two positions we can least afford it. qb & wr. total waste of time, space & money... if tannehill isn't who we hope he is as a qb while also becoming a great leader, we are doomed to mediocrity once again for the foreseeable future.