FINatic054
Scout Team
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2006
- Messages
- 875
- Reaction score
- 529
I’d move up and draft Pitts at 6 and Parson hopefully at 9
Could this really happen? Interesting
- Thread starter dolphinheel
- Start date
I don't care what that chart says, there's no way moving from 18 to 9 would only cost us pick 50. Stop dreaming people.
dolphinheel
Active Roster
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2004
- Messages
- 5,846
- Reaction score
- 8,184
Maybe I misread it but thought it would cost us both 2nds
ah, maybe I'm the one that misread it.....lol
1 Freakin, unbearable, slow week away! My heart rate is already going up!
Samphin
Dolphins Homer
Chris Grier: "Hey George"
Geroge Paton "Hey Chris"
Media: DOLPHINS IN TALKS WITH DENVER TO TRADE THE SIXTH OVERALL PICK AND THE FT. LAUDERDALE HYATT.
Geroge Paton "Hey Chris"
Media: DOLPHINS IN TALKS WITH DENVER TO TRADE THE SIXTH OVERALL PICK AND THE FT. LAUDERDALE HYATT.
cltchperf
Pro Bowler
- Joined
- May 12, 2005
- Messages
- 10,136
- Reaction score
- 5,733
I don't know , if miami manages to get pitts. I'd say get a top defender or player at 18 as the wr class is deep. And some pretty good wrs miami can get at 36 or 50. I would rather miami get a rb at 36 tho if Etienne or Javonte Williams are there and maybe Rashod Bateman with other 2nd. The offense could be looking pretty good with those picksKeep 6 and then trade up from 18 to 9. Never considered this option.
Dolphins, Denver and Connecting the Potential Dots
Miami Dolphins General Manager Chris Grier had a discussion with Denver counterpart and former colleague George Patonwww.si.com
Pandarilla
Active Roster
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
- Messages
- 2,904
- Reaction score
- 4,069
Might still have a shot at Sewell...
No idea
No idea
cltchperf
Pro Bowler
- Joined
- May 12, 2005
- Messages
- 10,136
- Reaction score
- 5,733
or Slater, who is seen as a very good tackle prospect as well
AvogadrosNumber
Active Roster
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2016
- Messages
- 759
- Reaction score
- 1,272
I’d love an aggressive trade up - we need blue chippers if we want to actually win something for once
KingHydra
Active Roster
Id rather trade back and GET 2 second rounders. Phuk that.
This year's second round will be packed to the gills with NFL starter quality players.
This year's second round will be packed to the gills with NFL starter quality players.
No...it said based on the chart...36 was slightly too much....50 was not quite enough....
This trade would only happen with pick 9 on the clock.....
yeah both yall misread, but im just copying Blue only going into more detail
18 + 36 = 9 + 114 (their 4th round pick)
Definately would have to be a draft day trade to see whats on the board at the 9. If we do something like go Sewell at 6, then hell yeah i want us to come back up to get one of the top weapons. If we get Pitts, then yeah it wouldnt hurt to come back up and get waddle/smith if available. If we draft Chase/Waddle/Smith at 6 then there is zero reason to trade back up to pick up one of the other 3.
Just get one of the big 4 at 6, and hope that Parsons or another player slides to 18. If we draft chase or waddle 6 and for some reason the weight scares everyone and Smith drops to 18 (doubtful), than sure, draft 2 1st round wide recievers I guess, hell flip one of the midgets for a late round pick in this scenario.