hes good, but I'd rather take Orton.Section126 said:
1. I do not think we are taking either Smith or Rodgers if available.
2. Spielman has scouted him extensively.
3. Saban recruited him heavily.
4. He will be available in the third round.....possibly.
Say hello to our future Starting Quarterback.
My prediction: We take him in the third round........what do you all think?
Personally....I think this kid has as much upside as Rodgers...maybe not as much as Smith.
BlueFin said:He doesn't have the upside of either, he totally stunk it up at the Senior Bowl and revealed the flaws in his game.
BlueFin said:He doesn't have the upside of either, he totally stunk it up at the Senior Bowl and revealed the flaws in his game.
Buddwalk said:Very slow release...
Deep ball is inaccurate...i wouldnt draft him
ptmn said:I'm a huge UConn fan, and all I care about is he took a team of nothings and won a bowl with them. Nobody really cares about the factor of winning when they judge players. I agree some talent is necessary, but it isn't everything, a lot of good players were underrated at draft time and turn into a great player. Dan is one of them, I would be happy if we picked him up to groom as a future QB.
Agree, I would rather have Walter.Buddwalk said:Very slow release...
Deep ball is inaccurate...i wouldnt draft him
Joey 22 said:Comparing Chaump King and McPherson its like comparing Tim Bowens to Corey Dillon, I mean you are comparing them just cause they are both Afro-American and thats stupid King and McPherson have nothing in common.:shakeno: