Canadianfishfan
FinHeavean VIP
That says.. that Hyde like everyone else thinks it's the MOST PLAUSIBLE... Doesn't say anything more. THE FACT is... Martin had to show evidence to support his claim in order to BEGIN any proceedings... THAT IS THE FACT... He HAD TO. And that info could have been intercepted or 'leaked' in any number of different ways... By any number of different people... And just because it is not in the Dolphins or NFL's 'benefit' does not mean it isn't possible... And yet here we are arguing things like 'Martin's agenda' which is nothing but spin or opinion based on SPECULATION...
Amigo we can go round and round on this... You want to crucify Martin??? Go for it... And we can go 'opinion to opinion'... but if you are gonna ask for 'equal rights' than you have to do it for both parties... That's what it means. All I'm asking is you afford Martin EVERYTHING you ask on behalf of Incognito.
I already have in MANY MANY MANY posts.. I've said MANY MANY MANY TIMES that what has been presented may be true. So you're going off on me for nothing.
And another thing:
Armando Salguero @ArmandoSalguero 11m
One more time: There are many layers to the Martin-Incognito-NFL review situation. WE DO NOT KNOW ALL THE FACTS. Coming out in droplets.
That's all I'm saying.